-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: [#176825286,#176323469] Features Carousel: Items are now shown depending on local and remote feature flag. BPD item is shown only when user is not enrolled to the program, hidden if loading or the information is not available #2793
Merged
Undermaken
merged 10 commits into
master
from
176825286-fixes-bonus-available-selector-usage
Feb 12, 2021
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e1c0b48
[#176825286] Clean usage of availableBonusSelector with memoized one
CrisTofani f3dfdfe
Merge branch 'master' into 176825286-fixes-bonus-available-selector-u…
CrisTofani 3c94f16
Merge branch 'master' into 176825286-fixes-bonus-available-selector-u…
Undermaken 21ceb44
Merge branch 'master' into 176825286-fixes-bonus-available-selector-u…
CrisTofani 1200c55
[#176825286] Fix carousel items rendering logic
CrisTofani 4acc44b
Merge branch 'master' into 176825286-fixes-bonus-available-selector-u…
CrisTofani 3e1d3aa
Merge branch 'master' into 176825286-fixes-bonus-available-selector-u…
CrisTofani 659b6eb
[#176825286] add return type
Undermaken cf3d311
[#176825286] Fixes check on BpdActive bonus
CrisTofani 7a8beb0
[#176825286] add tests
Undermaken File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this expression never returns
undefined
. It returns always aboolean
we should implement this logic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're absolutely right I thought to commit the previously suggested code:
I'm fixing it asap!