Dismantle Mux expression / Ternary operator in dpdk #3087
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mihaibudiu
requested changes
Feb 17, 2022
kamleshbhalui
force-pushed
the
Dismantle_Mux
branch
from
49e068f to
a7272be
Compare
mihaibudiu
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2022
kamleshbhalui
force-pushed
the
Dismantle_Mux
branch
from
a7272be to
3a539ad
Compare
|
@mbudiu-vmw Please merge it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
LowerExpressions pass which introduces ternary operator (?:) which is not supported in DPDK.
This PR dismantle ternary operator to if else chain.