Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: reduce memory allocation while resolving package.json #317

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

Boshen
Copy link
Member

@Boshen Boshen commented Nov 22, 2024

No description provided.

@Boshen Boshen changed the title perf: reduce path allocation while resolving package.json perf: reduce memory allocation while resolving package.json Nov 22, 2024
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 22, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #317 will not alter performance

Comparing perf-package-json (e1bd30c) with main (08a19d7)

Summary

✅ 3 untouched benchmarks

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.06%. Comparing base (08a19d7) to head (e1bd30c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #317      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.06%   97.06%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        2454     2450       -4     
==========================================
- Hits         2382     2378       -4     
  Misses         72       72              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@Boshen
Copy link
Member Author

Boshen commented Nov 22, 2024

image

@Boshen Boshen merged commit d5b88b3 into main Nov 22, 2024
21 checks passed
@Boshen Boshen deleted the perf-package-json branch November 22, 2024 06:49
@Boshen Boshen mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant