Should / shall optional vs required #27
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Should can be perceived as nice but optional. I suggest using shall, will, or must to show that these are required to achieve the goal and not just suggestions to be optionally taken.
|
I get what you are saying but first, the board needs to convert the should into shall and we hope with this effort it will. |
|
We also dont want to change the text after so many people have signed 😁 |
|
Closing based on #42 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Should can be perceived as nice but optional. I suggest using shall, will, or must to show that these are required to achieve the goal and not just suggestions to be optionally taken.