Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

zig: make throwOutOfMemory use JSError #15413

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024
Merged

zig: make throwOutOfMemory use JSError #15413

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

nektro
Copy link
Member

@nektro nektro commented Nov 26, 2024

progress towards #15141

@robobun
Copy link

robobun commented Nov 26, 2024

@nektro, your commit c96fe0e has 15 failures in #6892:

  • test/js/bun/http/bun-serve-static.test.ts - timeout on 🐧 3.20 x64-baseline
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/worker-nested-uncaught.test.js - segmentation fault on 🐧 3.20 x64-baseline
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/worker-nested-uncaught.test.js - segmentation fault on 🐧 3.20 x64
  • test/js/web/fetch/fetch-preconnect.test.ts - 1 failing on 🍎 14 aarch64
  • test/integration/next-pages/test/dev-server.test.ts - 1 failing on 🐧 3.20 x64-baseline
  • test/integration/next-pages/test/dev-server.test.ts - 1 failing on 🐧 3.20 x64
  • test/js/node/watch/fs.watch.test.ts - 3 failing on 🍎 14 aarch64
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/fs-watch-recursive-linux-parallel-remove.test.js - 1 failing on 🐧 12 x64
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/fs-watch-recursive-linux-parallel-remove.test.js - 1 failing on 🐧 20.04 x64
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/fs-watch-recursive-linux-parallel-remove.test.js - 1 failing on 🐧 3.20 aarch64
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/fs-watch-recursive-linux-parallel-remove.test.js - 1 failing on 🐧 12 x64-baseline
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/fs-watch-recursive-linux-parallel-remove.test.js - 1 failing on 🐧 20.04 x64-baseline
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/fs-watch-recursive-linux-parallel-remove.test.js - 1 failing on 🐧 22.04 x64
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/fs-watch-recursive-linux-parallel-remove.test.js - 1 failing on 🐧 22.04 x64-baseline
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/fs-watch-recursive-linux-parallel-remove.test.js - 1 failing on 🐧 3.20 x64-baseline
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/fs-watch-recursive-linux-parallel-remove.test.js - 1 failing on 🐧 3.20 x64
  • test/v8/v8.test.ts - 22 failing on 🐧 3.20 aarch64
  • test/v8/v8.test.ts - 22 failing on 🐧 3.20 x64-baseline
  • test/v8/v8.test.ts - 22 failing on 🐧 3.20 x64
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/fs-watch-encoding.test.js - 2 failing on 🍎 14 aarch64
  • test/js/node/child_process/child_process.test.ts - 1 failing on 🐧 3.20 aarch64
  • test/js/node/child_process/child_process.test.ts - 1 failing on 🐧 3.20 x64
  • test/js/node/child_process/child_process.test.ts - 1 failing on 🐧 3.20 x64-baseline
  • test/bundler/bundler_compile.test.ts - 1 failing on 🐧 12 x64
  • test/js/bun/http/serve.test.ts - segmentation fault on 🐧 3.20 aarch64
  • test/js/bun/http/serve.test.ts - segmentation fault on 🐧 3.20 x64-baseline
  • test/js/bun/http/serve.test.ts - segmentation fault on 🐧 3.20 x64
  • test/integration/next-pages/test/next-build.test.ts - 1 failing on 🐧 22.04 aarch64
  • test/integration/next-pages/test/next-build.test.ts - 1 failing on 🐧 22.04 x64
  • test/js/web/timers/setInterval.test.js - 1 failing on 🪟 2019 x64-baseline
  • test/js/node/test/parallel/child-process-exec-timeout-kill.test.js - 1 failing on 🍎 13 aarch64
  • test/cli/hot/hot.test.ts - timeout on 🍎 14 aarch64
  • test/cli/hot/hot.test.ts - timeout on 🐧 3.20 x64-baseline
  • @nektro nektro marked this pull request as ready for review November 26, 2024 03:49
    src/bun.js/api/glob.zig Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
    @nektro nektro merged commit 663f00b into main Nov 26, 2024
    65 of 67 checks passed
    @nektro nektro deleted the nektro-patch-40348 branch November 26, 2024 20:58
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants