-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 508
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AO3-6392 Comment actions when replying in full page #4381
Merged
Merged
Changes from 21 commits
Commits
Show all changes
25 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
23b7f40
Hide comment actions same as with JS
ceithir 5b1d7ec
Fix Cancel button on non-JS reply
ceithir eed9298
Hound
ceithir 33549a7
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into AO3-6392
ceithir 0da28cb
Hound
ceithir 5a3ea87
Add test for hiding feature
ceithir 349662d
Work page test
ceithir 053653e
Add test for the cancel button not being updated
ceithir 9d2fb96
Hound
ceithir 092ca29
Hound (bis)
ceithir dd1624a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into AO3-6392
ceithir 0464799
Reviewdog
ceithir 6adb2b1
Use function instead of copy paste
ceithir 0d943e4
Reviewdog?
ceithir 5def011
Reviewdog, but right this time
ceithir f538178
Fix wrong domain issue in tests
ceithir 6131a7b
Wording
ceithir 94f6e83
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into AO3-6392
ceithir 1d2e189
Rename
ceithir c3581e2
Actually unused?
ceithir c849170
No more need for forced reload
ceithir 05b6e0b
Test cleanup
ceithir e9a349d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into AO3-6392
ceithir ad76b38
Merge upstream
brianjaustin bcb960f
Fix guest comments in tests
brianjaustin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Conflicted about this.
On one hand, it does fix every issue I had in tests about being redirect to the wrong domain (example.com).
On the other, changing such a critical piece of code just so tests pass trigger every warning in my brain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I'm normally not a fan of that either, and the alarm bells are screaming. But ignoring my knee-jerk "let's not do this," I can't think of a reason it shouldn't be
only_path: true
. We definitely prefer paths to URLs. I think the only reason we hadn't already changed it is we do something in nginx that means this wasn't actively causing issues when we were supporting both HTTP and HTTPS. So this is probably fine.