You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the position of amr cells and sink particles are named xyz.
But this is not a very good name, both in the Datagroup and for the figure axes.
(It labels the axes on a map as xyz_x and xyz_y).
Should we rename this to position to be consistent with the particles position field?
Another option would be to keep them as separate components x, y, and z instead of making them into a vector, but I don't like this as much as it makes it more difficult to re-center the domain with something like data['amr']['position'] - center (you would now have to have 3 operations instead)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
nvaytet
changed the title
Labels xyz_x and xyz_y on maps
Rename xyz to position?
Feb 10, 2022
Currently, the position of amr cells and sink particles are named
xyz
.But this is not a very good name, both in the
Datagroup
and for the figure axes.(It labels the axes on a map as
xyz_x
andxyz_y
).position
to be consistent with the particlesposition
field?x
,y
, andz
instead of making them into a vector, but I don't like this as much as it makes it more difficult to re-center the domain with something likedata['amr']['position'] - center
(you would now have to have 3 operations instead)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: