Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Run fieldalignment on ./checker, ./checks and ./finding #3569

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

AdamKorcz
Copy link
Contributor

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

This PR runs fieldalignment on ./checker, ./checks, ./finding and ./pkg.

fieldAlignment complains in make check-linter, but running fieldAlignment also removes comments, so I am not quite sure about it.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

NONE

Special notes for your reviewer

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

For user-facing changes, please add a concise, human-readable release note to
the release-note

(In particular, describe what changes users might need to make in their
application as a result of this pull request.)


@AdamKorcz AdamKorcz temporarily deployed to gitlab October 13, 2023 20:14 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@AdamKorcz AdamKorcz temporarily deployed to integration-test October 13, 2023 20:15 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3569 (e0f2d01) into main (8eaf0d7) will decrease coverage by 4.90%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3569      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.26%   60.37%   -4.90%     
==========================================
  Files         194      182      -12     
  Lines       13490    12668     -822     
==========================================
- Hits         8804     7648    -1156     
- Misses       4214     4570     +356     
+ Partials      472      450      -22     

Comment on lines +28 to +46
Metadata MetadataData
BranchProtectionResults BranchProtectionsData
CIIBestPracticesResults CIIBestPracticesData
CITestResults CITestData
FuzzingResults FuzzingData
SignedReleasesResults SignedReleasesData
CodeReviewResults CodeReviewData
ContributorsResults ContributorsData
DangerousWorkflowResults DangerousWorkflowData
WebhookResults WebhooksData
DependencyUpdateToolResults DependencyUpdateToolData
FuzzingResults FuzzingData
BinaryArtifactResults BinaryArtifactData
LicenseResults LicenseData
MaintainedResults MaintainedData
Metadata MetadataData
VulnerabilitiesResults VulnerabilitiesData
CITestResults CITestData
PackagingResults PackagingData
PinningDependenciesResults PinningDependenciesData
SecurityPolicyResults SecurityPolicyData
SignedReleasesResults SignedReleasesData
MaintainedResults MaintainedData
TokenPermissionsResults TokenPermissionsData
VulnerabilitiesResults VulnerabilitiesData
WebhookResults WebhooksData
DangerousWorkflowResults DangerousWorkflowData
CIIBestPracticesResults CIIBestPracticesData
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't this reverse #3540 ?

Can we talk about what you're seeing with make check-linter?

@AdamKorcz AdamKorcz closed this Oct 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants