Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨SAST: no longer skip "neutral" checks #1237

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2021
Merged

✨SAST: no longer skip "neutral" checks #1237

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2021

Conversation

evverx
Copy link
Contributor

@evverx evverx commented Nov 10, 2021

Some SASTs like LGTM don't analyze PRs where code hasn't been changed,
which leads to their status being "neutral" there.

It's a follow up to #1232 (comment)

I'm not sure what to do about one-offs like the one
mentioned in #1232 (comment)
that shouldn't affect the aggregate score but it can probably
be fixed later.

cc @laurentsimon

Some SASTs like LGTM don't analyze PRs where code hasn't been changed,
which leads to their status being "neutral" there.

It's a follow up to #1232 (comment)

I'm not sure what to do about one-offs like the one
mentioned in #1232 (comment)
that shouldn't affect the aggregate score but it can probably
be fixed later.
Copy link
Member

@naveensrinivasan naveensrinivasan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@laurentsimon
Copy link
Contributor

laurentsimon commented Nov 10, 2021

Thanks for the quick turnaround!
Shall we make a similar update to the CI-Test check in function prHasSuccessfulCheck?

@laurentsimon laurentsimon enabled auto-merge (squash) November 10, 2021 19:47
@laurentsimon laurentsimon merged commit 5524c97 into ossf:main Nov 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants