Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Return to 0.9.0 TaxCalc as Default #595

Closed
brittainhard opened this issue Jul 28, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Return to 0.9.0 TaxCalc as Default #595

brittainhard opened this issue Jul 28, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@brittainhard
Copy link
Contributor

As per request from @MattHJensen, we need to keep the default taxcalc version at 0.9.0 for now. Next release will be done with version 0.9.0.

@brittainhard brittainhard changed the title Return to 0.9.0 Taxcalc as Default Return to 0.9.0 TaxCalc as Default Jul 28, 2017
@martinholmer
Copy link
Contributor

@brittainhard said:

As per request from @MattHJensen, we need to keep the default taxcalc version at 0.9.0 for now. Next release will be done with version 0.9.0.

OK. But a little explanation about why we are doing this would help the whole team understand what's going on.

@MattHJensen
Copy link
Contributor

MattHJensen commented Jul 28, 2017

@martinholmer, I plan to send out a note to the policybrains-modelers mailing list later this afternoon on this topic, but here is the preview:

I think it we should go through two rounds of the release process (see the updated version in #594). The first would release a webapp-public update that fixes the file upload bugs. The second would release a webapp-public update that upgrades to taxcalc 0.9.2.

@brittainhard would kick off the first round at step 3, by mailing the mailing list with the commit that is slated to be tagged 1.0.1.

After the first round is complete, @hdoupe would pick up the 0.9.2 release process at step 4, by testing 0.9.2 with webapp-public locally.

Alternatively, we could do the 0.9.2 release process first, in which case we are on step 4 by @hdoupe

@martinholmer
Copy link
Contributor

@MattHJensen, Thanks for the explanation in webapp-public #595. Seems reasonable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants