Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf(event bus): Remove expensive Logger debug call in PublishEventTx… #38

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024

Conversation

czarcas7ic
Copy link
Member

… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937)

Component of cometbft#2869

This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now.

I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these.


PR checklist



PR checklist

  • Tests written/updated
  • Changelog entry added in .changelog (we use unclog to manage our changelog)
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/ or spec/) and code comments

… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937)

Component of cometbft#2869 

This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis
mainnet right now.

I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the
logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never
seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly,
rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that
concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from
these.


---

#### PR checklist

- [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests
- [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use
[unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our
changelog)
- [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code
comments
- [X] Title follows the [Conventional
Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec
<hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by
[Mergify](https://mergify.com).

---------

Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <[email protected]>
@czarcas7ic czarcas7ic added S:backport/v24 backport to the osmo-v24/v0.37.4 branch S:backport/v25 backport to the osmo-v25/v0.37.4 branch labels May 2, 2024
@czarcas7ic czarcas7ic marked this pull request as ready for review May 2, 2024 23:34
@czarcas7ic czarcas7ic merged commit a9991fd into osmo/v0.37.4 May 2, 2024
18 checks passed
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38)

Component of cometbft#2869

This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis
mainnet right now.

I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the
logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never
seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly,
rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that
concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from
these.

---

#### PR checklist

- [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests
- [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use
[unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our
changelog)
- [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code
comments
- [X] Title follows the [Conventional
Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec
<hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by
[Mergify](https://mergify.com).

---------

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit a9991fd)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38)

Component of cometbft#2869

This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis
mainnet right now.

I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the
logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never
seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly,
rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that
concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from
these.

---

#### PR checklist

- [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests
- [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use
[unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our
changelog)
- [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code
comments
- [X] Title follows the [Conventional
Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec
<hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by
[Mergify](https://mergify.com).

---------

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit a9991fd)
czarcas7ic added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38) (#44)

Component of cometbft#2869

This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis
mainnet right now.

I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the
logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never
seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly,
rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that
concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from
these.

---

#### PR checklist

- [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests
- [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use
[unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our
changelog)
- [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code
comments
- [X] Title follows the [Conventional
Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec
<hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by
[Mergify](https://mergify.com).

---------

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit a9991fd)

Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <[email protected]>
czarcas7ic added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38) (#45)

Component of cometbft#2869

This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis
mainnet right now.

I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the
logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never
seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly,
rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that
concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from
these.

---

#### PR checklist

- [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests
- [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use
[unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our
changelog)
- [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code
comments
- [X] Title follows the [Conventional
Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec
<hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by
[Mergify](https://mergify.com).

---------

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit a9991fd)

Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S:backport/v24 backport to the osmo-v24/v0.37.4 branch S:backport/v25 backport to the osmo-v25/v0.37.4 branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant