Tenant specific explore pages #49
-
Sunbird-Ed Portal supports tenant specific explore pages using "https://<>/<<tenant_id>>/explore". Example in DIKSHA - https://diksha.gov.in/cbse/explore, https://diksha.gov.in/ncert/explore. We are now able to do this for category specific pages (like Digital Textbooks, Courses etc.) through page configuration where Channel Id (of the tenant) can be included as part of the query parameter. But this is working only in the scenario of a guest user (without login). If a logged in user is accessing these pages, it shows assets published by all tenants. There seems to be no way to configure this behaviour. This is an issue, because it is inconsistency. Irrespective of whether the user is logged in or not, when a user accesses a tenant specific explore page of an asset category, it should show assets that are published only by that tenant. Any further filtering should happen only on top of this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
@kameshbhr Today most of the users of DIKSHA do not have a strong understanding of the concept of tenants. Most of them would access these pages in exploratory purposes. These tenant specific pages are pre-dominantly used by state department users. As there is an amount of training imparted to such personal. They will be able to identify the difference between normal explore and tenant explore pages. We are seeing two challenges in this solution: b) If a User is already signed in and belongs to specific organisation. His tenant settings are loaded by default. This current solution is solving the issues for most of the tenants today. This solution needs to be thought through in a more generalized way as I see this problem can be solved for all the users of tenants except NCERT where we do not have a specific framework category term to be identified with. @luckynvdu I see that this solution needs to be discussed thoroughly as it can impact users in a big way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@kameshbhr User has to be onboarded under the organisation as privileged user Most of the organisations has a framework category term attached. This is the solution that is already in place. I see the delta in the solution is that organisation can only be associated with framework category term today. It is also possible to extend this to associate any part of content metadata as criteria. This extension being built up will help us to solve the problem holistically for all the use cases. Ex: Any organisation can start to have association with multiple publishers, multiple content Categories, framework terms etc This gives the utmost flexibility for any organisation for relevant discovery. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@kameshbhr we are locking this thread from further conversation |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@kameshbhr
Here is the solution we propose from SunirdED
User has to be onboarded under the organisation as privileged user
Most of the organisations has a framework category term attached. This is the solution that is already in place.
I see the delta in the solution is that organisation can only be associated with framework category term today. It is also possible to extend this to associate any part of content metadata as criteria. This extension being built up will help us to solve the problem holistically for all the use cases.
Ex: Any organisation can start to have association with multiple publishers, multiple content Categories, framework terms etc
This gives the utmost flexibilit…