Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix part of #138: Topic train fragment Low-fi UI (Part 1) #200

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2019

Conversation

rt4914
Copy link
Contributor

@rt4914 rt4914 commented Oct 3, 2019

Explanation

Replicated from #197

Part 1: This PR contains basic XML files for creating TopicTrainFragment.
Part 2: #202
Part 3: #203
Part 4: #204

Mock: https://xd.adobe.com/spec/e2239cf4-9cde-4c08-5296-25316c1f0a14-9412/screen/f403add1-079a-4202-9975-efe04c076290/Home-Page-1-Start-Learning-Pre-Scroll-6

Checklist

  • The PR title starts with "Fix #bugnum: ", followed by a short, clear summary of the changes. (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".)
  • The PR explanation includes the words "Fixes #bugnum: ..." (or "Fixes part of #bugnum" if the PR only partially fixes an issue).
  • The PR follows the style guide.
  • The PR does not contain any unnecessary auto-generated code from Android Studio.
  • The PR is made from a branch that's not called "develop".
  • The PR is assigned to an appropriate reviewer.

@rt4914
Copy link
Contributor Author

rt4914 commented Oct 3, 2019

@veena14cs @nikitamarysolomanpvt PTAL

@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ dependencies {
'androidx.constraintlayout:constraintlayout:1.1.3',
'androidx.core:core-ktx:1.0.2',
'androidx.lifecycle:lifecycle-runtime-ktx:2.2.0-alpha03',
'androidx.recyclerview:recyclerview:1.0.0',
'com.google.dagger:dagger:2.24',
"org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk7:$kotlin_version",
"org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-core:1.2.1",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

use single quotes

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

single quotes not yet updated

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I mentioned this in my last PR (#197 ), I am only adding a new recyclerview and I prefer not to update someone else's PR. The double quotes has been mentioned from Ben's PR.

Later on we can solve such nit issues by creating a separate PR.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay

@veena14cs veena14cs assigned rt4914 and unassigned veena14cs Oct 3, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@veena14cs veena14cs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@nikitamarysolomanpvt nikitamarysolomanpvt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

previous suggestions are not updated in split PR

@nikitamarysolomanpvt nikitamarysolomanpvt removed their assignment Oct 3, 2019
@rt4914
Copy link
Contributor Author

rt4914 commented Oct 3, 2019

Merging this PR, as it looks up-to-date.

@rt4914 rt4914 merged commit 0acf7e9 into develop Oct 3, 2019
@rt4914 rt4914 deleted the topic-train-low-fi-part-1 branch October 3, 2019 12:48
@rt4914 rt4914 restored the topic-train-low-fi-part-1 branch October 3, 2019 13:01
@rt4914 rt4914 changed the title Fix (#138): Topic train fragment Low-fi UI (Part 1) Fix part of #138: Topic train fragment Low-fi UI (Part 1) Oct 4, 2019
@rt4914 rt4914 deleted the topic-train-low-fi-part-1 branch October 5, 2019 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants