Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

removed path check as kubectl is handling path in it #5648

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 12, 2022
Merged

removed path check as kubectl is handling path in it #5648

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 12, 2022

Conversation

laxmikantbpandhare
Copy link
Member

@laxmikantbpandhare laxmikantbpandhare commented Apr 11, 2022

Description of the change:
Previously we added this error to show the user that the Path component is part of proxy server. Now, kubectl made this fix that handles this case and there is no need to throw this error anymore.

Motivation for the change:
The user should be able to run the operator with the proxy path in it.

Checklist

If the pull request includes user-facing changes, extra documentation is required:

@laxmikantbpandhare laxmikantbpandhare added this to the v1.20.0 milestone Apr 11, 2022
@laxmikantbpandhare laxmikantbpandhare self-assigned this Apr 11, 2022
@laxmikantbpandhare laxmikantbpandhare linked an issue Apr 11, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@jmrodri jmrodri changed the title removed this check as kubectl is handling path in it removed path check as kubectl is handling path in it Apr 11, 2022
@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

Took a look and it looks good to me. Since I am still new, I will leave the approvals to others.

@laxmikantbpandhare
Copy link
Member Author

Took a look and it looks good to me. Since I am still new, I will leave the approvals to others.

Sure @everettraven - thank you for reviewing it.

Signed-off-by: laxmikantbpandhare <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: laxmikantbpandhare <[email protected]>
@jberkhahn
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

can't get the CI to pass though, it keeps failing on some linkchecking garbage

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 11, 2022
@laxmikantbpandhare
Copy link
Member Author

laxmikantbpandhare commented Apr 11, 2022

/lgtm

can't get the CI to pass though, it keeps failing on some linkchecking garbage

thank you @jberkhahn for trying multiple times. Yes, it was some link-checking error. My PR do not have any change in any of the docs.

Copy link
Member

@jmrodri jmrodri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@jmrodri jmrodri merged commit b6e67cc into operator-framework:master Apr 12, 2022
VenkatRamaraju pushed a commit to VenkatRamaraju/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request May 18, 2022
…ork#5648)

* removed this check as kubectl is handling path in it
* added changelog
* removed test file

Signed-off-by: laxmikantbpandhare <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Venkat Ramaraju <[email protected]>
VenkatRamaraju pushed a commit to VenkatRamaraju/operator-sdk that referenced this pull request May 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Development proxy ignores path in K8s API URL
4 participants