🐛 fix an erroneous e2e testdata path update #440
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #440 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 37.83% 37.83%
=======================================
Files 15 15
Lines 1208 1208
=======================================
Hits 457 457
Misses 701 701
Partials 50 50 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: Jordan Keister <[email protected]>
grokspawn
force-pushed
the
e2e-upgrade-fix
branch
from
861e695
to
3de6fdf
Compare
grokspawn
changed the title
tmshort
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When we pushed types updates recently, we totally expected to see the e2e-upgrade test fail since it pulls in the manifests from the latest release, and they changes were breaking.
However, we missed an erroneous update that was made to the e2e-upgrade test which presumed that the catalog data was an API access (which wasn't).