Feature: add yurtappset v1beta1

[luc99hen]

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Following the proposal #1890 #1931

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

@rambohe-ch

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

other Note

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 282 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (da03883) 52.04% compared to head (c3bfe1a) 52.39%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...ger/controller/yurtappset/yurtappset_controller.go	49.63%	118 Missing and 21 partials ⚠️
...r/yurtappset/workloadmanager/deployment_manager.go	54.46%	37 Missing and 14 partials ⚠️
...ebhook/yurtappset/v1beta1/yurtappset_validation.go	27.50%	21 Missing and 8 partials ⚠️
pkg/yurtmanager/controller/yurtappset/revision.go	74.74%	20 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
...ager/controller/yurtappset/workloadmanager/util.go	78.31%	14 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...er/controller/yurtappset/workloadmanager/tweaks.go	87.32%	6 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
pkg/yurtmanager/controller/yurtappset/utils.go	83.87%	3 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...tmanager/controller/util/refmanager/ref_manager.go	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...r/webhook/yurtappset/v1beta1/yurtappset_handler.go	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1939      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   52.04%   52.39%   +0.34%     
==========================================
  Files         174      173       -1     
  Lines       21213    21007     -206     
==========================================
- Hits        11040    11006      -34     
+ Misses       9199     9051     -148     
+ Partials      974      950      -24     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	52.39% <61.36%> (+0.34%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[luc99hen]

/rerun

[rambohe-ch]

/rerun

[luc99hen]

e2e fail due to the compatibility issues implemented in convert logic, currently known issues are:

1. v1alpha1 status replicas, readyReplicas can not obtained from v1beta1, use estimate workload*defaultReplica
2. v1alpha1 status currenetRevision conversion logic missing
3. v1alpha1 spec selector can not obtained from v1beta1 directly, use deployment/statefulset selector

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

The SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, but some issues were introduced.

11 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[rambohe-ch]

/lgtm