-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 407
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Proposal] High Availability of Edge Services Proposal #1816
Conversation
@Rui-Gan: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: your_reviewer. Note that only openyurtio members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/hold |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- We need to add introduction for modifying kernel parameters.
- When synchronizing
keepalived
, try not to break user-defined configurations. - The use of
keepalived
containers could be reflected in the proposal, we need to use theosixia/keepalived
image in the Pod.
|
by the way, please fix the markdown file errors. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1816 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 52.20% 52.20%
=======================================
Files 172 172
Lines 20828 20828
=======================================
Hits 10874 10874
Misses 8993 8993
Partials 961 961
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
/assign @wangxye |
@Rui-Gan: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: wangxye. Note that only openyurtio members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign @LavenderQAQ |
/rerun |
1 similar comment
/rerun |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/unhold |
Signed-off-by: Rui-Gan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rui-Gan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rui-Gan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rui-Gan <[email protected]>
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs No Coverage information |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: LavenderQAQ, rambohe-ch, Rui-Gan The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
* add lb proposal Signed-off-by: Rui-Gan <[email protected]>
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
For multi-instance service applications within the same edge node pool, design and implement a high-availability solution at the network layer to ensure that client requests are not forwarded to faulty service instances. Moreover, it should be capable of distributing requests to healthy service endpoints according to a predetermined policy.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
other Note