-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 443
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEATURE] Add Semi-SL multilabel classification algorithm #1805
Conversation
c09a514
to
6c06b9a
Compare
6c06b9a
to
e04671c
Compare
e04671c
to
059cb8e
Compare
059cb8e
to
24205e1
Compare
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1805 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 80.66% 80.73% +0.07%
===========================================
Files 486 488 +2
Lines 33249 33361 +112
===========================================
+ Hits 26819 26934 +115
+ Misses 6430 6427 -3
... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
5689e03
to
240f20b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
docs/source/guide/explanation/algorithms/classification/multi_label_classification.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/source/guide/explanation/algorithms/classification/multi_label_classification.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/source/guide/explanation/algorithms/classification/multi_label_classification.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/source/guide/explanation/algorithms/classification/multi_label_classification.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/source/guide/explanation/algorithms/classification/multi_label_classification.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/source/guide/explanation/algorithms/classification/multi_label_classification.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
0ec1be5
to
b811539
Compare
Co-authored-by: Jihwan Eom <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is great work!
The only thing I would say is that the E2E test is missing. Other than that, I have no comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Future work: