Update ONNX Runtime from rel-1.8.1 to rel-1.14.0

[zhaixuejun1993]

Details:

• Update ONNX Runtime from rel-1.8.1 to rel-1.14.0

Tickets:

[ilyachur]

Please fix:

CMake Error: Unknown argument --compile-no-warning-as-error
CMake Error: Run 'cmake --help' for all supported options.

[zhaixuejun1993]

The CI filed with error: CMake Error: Unknown argument --compile-no-warning-as-error
This option ware added in PR: microsoft/onnxruntime@efcbdac#diff-a545fb992b8a8781df05a2c40541f429bfff7e0d8ecc9ef0f5d559994e187814

[ilyachur]

The CI filed with error: CMake Error: Unknown argument --compile-no-warning-as-error This option ware added in PR: microsoft/onnxruntime@efcbdac#diff-a545fb992b8a8781df05a2c40541f429bfff7e0d8ecc9ef0f5d559994e187814

We need to disable this option, or use CMake 3.24+ for this option. https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/prop_tgt/COMPILE_WARNING_AS_ERROR.html

[zhaixuejun1993]

The CI filed with error: CMake Error: Unknown argument --compile-no-warning-as-error This option ware added in PR: microsoft/onnxruntime@efcbdac#diff-a545fb992b8a8781df05a2c40541f429bfff7e0d8ecc9ef0f5d559994e187814

We need to disable this option, or use CMake 3.24+ for this option. https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/prop_tgt/COMPILE_WARNING_AS_ERROR.html

Yes I also found that we need to upgtade CMake > 3.24

[riverlijunjie]

The CI filed with error: CMake Error: Unknown argument --compile-no-warning-as-error This option ware added in PR: microsoft/onnxruntime@efcbdac#diff-a545fb992b8a8781df05a2c40541f429bfff7e0d8ecc9ef0f5d559994e187814

We need to disable this option, or use CMake 3.24+ for this option. https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/prop_tgt/COMPILE_WARNING_AS_ERROR.html

Yes I also found that we need to upgtade CMake > 3.24

I think we should disable it for onnxruntime case, right?

[ilyachur]

The CI filed with error: CMake Error: Unknown argument --compile-no-warning-as-error This option ware added in PR: microsoft/onnxruntime@efcbdac#diff-a545fb992b8a8781df05a2c40541f429bfff7e0d8ecc9ef0f5d559994e187814

We need to disable this option, or use CMake 3.24+ for this option. https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/prop_tgt/COMPILE_WARNING_AS_ERROR.html

Yes I also found that we need to upgtade CMake > 3.24

I think we should disable it for onnxruntime case, right?

I think we can simpler update the CMake version

[ilya-lavrenov]

@ilyachur we have failed test CApiTest.test_custom_op_openvino_wrapper_library, which maybe interesting to look at from BW compatibility point of view in extensions.

[ilyachur]

@ilyachur we have failed test CApiTest.test_custom_op_openvino_wrapper_library, which maybe interesting to look at from BW compatibility point of view in extensions.

In the test we have a difference in 0.000001 maybe here we faced with float calculation and need to understand where this issue happens.

[zhaixuejun1993]

@ilyachur we have failed test CApiTest.test_custom_op_openvino_wrapper_library, which maybe interesting to look at from BW compatibility point of view in extensions.

In the test we have a difference in 0.000001 maybe here we faced with float calculation and need to understand where this issue happens.

@ilyachur @ilya-lavrenov This test is about an image classify (the input image is hand-drwn "1"), with MNIST model. test_custom_op_openvino_wrapper_library
I'm curious how the expected values were obtained expected_vals
Maybe the difference is caused by different version of OpenVINO backend, I don't know.
Anyway, how about the next step about this?

[ilyachur]

@ilyachur we have failed test CApiTest.test_custom_op_openvino_wrapper_library, which maybe interesting to look at from BW compatibility point of view in extensions.

In the test we have a difference in 0.000001 maybe here we faced with float calculation and need to understand where this issue happens.

@ilyachur @ilya-lavrenov This test is about an image classify (the input image is hand-drwn "1"), with MNIST model. test_custom_op_openvino_wrapper_library I'm curious how the expected values were obtained expected_vals Maybe the difference is caused by different version of OpenVINO backend, I don't know. Anyway, how about the next step about this?

Did we run this test with previous ONNXRuntime version?

[zhaixuejun1993]

@ilyachur we have failed test CApiTest.test_custom_op_openvino_wrapper_library, which maybe interesting to look at from BW compatibility point of view in extensions.

In the test we have a difference in 0.000001 maybe here we faced with float calculation and need to understand where this issue happens.

@ilyachur @ilya-lavrenov This test is about an image classify (the input image is hand-drwn "1"), with MNIST model. test_custom_op_openvino_wrapper_library I'm curious how the expected values were obtained expected_vals Maybe the difference is caused by different version of OpenVINO backend, I don't know. Anyway, how about the next step about this?

Did we run this test with previous ONNXRuntime version?

No this test ware added in version rel.1.14.0, no in rel-1.8.1