-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update 2018-07-01 ~ Add graphQL 3D ~ yet another pivot ~ R5 #31
Comments
@theo-armour - there's a lot here. Thanks! While loading a set of data makes sense, it is not a priority. Adding one node at a time to build up a map is sufficient at this time. I'd also expect GitHub Issues represent work to be done, rather than communicate what has already been done -otherwise, when is an Issue closed? Issues communicate work to be done. Issues should refer to a coherent set of work that delivers value for a User. Ideally, the smaller scope of an Issue, the better, so discussion can stay focused around a specific topic, rather than devolve into an exploration - which is better done in other channels. Loading data drives out the question about what types of formats to support. Starting at the 2nd bullet point, about There are many other references included in this Issue as well. I'd expect those to go in the wiki (which is also a GitHub repo) - or in https://github.com/opentecture/open-resources/tree/master/resources. Overall, not specifically sure what to do with this Issue. I appreciate that nodes are loading as cubes, from a file, and the cubes are textured. Associated data is also displaying on mouseover which is nice. These features are already included in |
@theo-armour - I copy pasted things to be parsed from this Issue into https://github.com/opentecture/mindmapping/wiki. I'm closing this Issue as it does not represent work to be done at this time. |
Reopening. ;-) Notices of UpdatesThe title of this issues starts with the words 'Update 2018-06-30' One of the tags to this issue is 'update' The purpose of issues with this type of title and tag is to inform members of this organization that there has been some update somewhere that may be of interest to the general membership. I find that using the GitHub issue feature is a fast, simple and easy way to inform peeps of what is going on. If you can propose a better war way, I would be delighted to follow up. In the meantime, we currently have three members and it would be nice to be able to attract more members. So I think this issue should remain open for at least a few days or until the next update is posted. The Purpose of Issues
I hear you. And yet common tags for issues also include quite open-ended discussion items including feature request, enhancements, usage questions help wanted and more. In these early stages and given the absence of a forum it may be worthwhile to broaden the scope of issue handling to cover general organization communications. This issue is an update not a task list
The text of the issue is - for the most part - a copy of the read me. It was intend to be taken as a reporting more than a wishlist. See https://opentecture.github.io/mindmapping/#graphql-3d/README.md Possible Test ApplicationsThe list of items is intended to be guidance more than specific tasks. For example. the concept of developing the Xanadu effort as Xanadu is currently specified might be more like creating an archaeology than creating a future. But I'm happy to organize a meetup with Ted Nelson if you are really interested. Priorities
There is more than enough code in the current mindmapping repo to reproduce every mind map depicted here as a bunch of 3D boxes But would there be any benefit whatsoever in reproducing such simple diagrams as 3D boxes? I say no. I think our task is bigger and broader. I think we need to consider a query language that helps you monitor and progress the tens of thousands of items that typically go into the average building. |
@theo-armour
To communicate with collaborators about work through GitHub typically goes
like this:
Member creates an Issue with some work to be done. Members can discuss it,
before the work happens. There is typically some planning that happens to
establish what Issues the team will work toward in a given amount of time.
When code is written, it is written to satisfy an Issue, and submitted as a
Pull Request. Members see Pull Request activity and have a chance to review
the code and respond BEFORE code is merged to master. Reviewing after
master is too late.
I created an Issue for Xanadu as a place to discuss it. It looks cool, but
a nth story to a building yet to have a foundation.
Members can review code changes via the commit log. Code represents the
what. Issues represent the why.
Issues drive Pull Requests. Visible communication happens as a byproduct.
Please close this Issue when you feel appropriate.
…On Sun, Jul 1, 2018, 00:45 Theo Armour ***@***.***> wrote:
@afomi <https://github.com/afomi>
Reopening. ;-)
Notices of Updates
The title of this issues starts with the words 'Update 2018-06-30'
One of the tags to this issue is 'update'
The purpose of issues with this type of title and tag is to inform members
of this organization that there has been some update somewhere that may be
of interest to the general membership.
I find that using the GitHub issue feature is a fast, simple and easy way
to inform peeps of what is going on. If you can propose a better war way, I
would be delighted to follow up.
In the meantime, we currently have three members and it would be nice to
be able to attract more members. So I think this issue should remain open
for at least a few days or until the next update is posted.
Possible Test Applications
The list of items is intended to be guidance more than specific tasks.
For example. the concept of developing the Xanadu effort as Xanadu is
currently specified might be more like creating an archaeology than
creating a future. But I'm happy to organize a meetup with Ted Nelson if
you are really interested.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#31 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEJkO1Wq7oEOZ__5s2lNNqqWi6SS2p_ks5uCH4ogaJpZM4U-Lj4>
.
|
@opentecture/the-brains Full Screen: graphQL 3D R5This is a first pass. Note new icons ( indicating Wikipedia data ) displayed behind gbXML BIM apps
Change Log R5
|
@opentecture/the-brains
Story
graphQL 3D R4
graphQL 3D Read Me
The priority must be for you to be able to grab and organize quantities of existing data for you more than you adding data one node at a time.
Concept
You want to
Augmented Reality and Augmented 3D
You want to be able to see the output by pointing your mobile device at the building and/or clicking on a 3D model of the building.
Textual data represented in 3D
There's a multitude of static text data on the web - goodly portions of which offer greats insights when graphed in 2D or 3D
Assemblies and components
The assembly and disassembly of a number of components into a finished assembly as visualized in 3D is a relatively unexplored territory
The traditional methods - large sheets of paper with numerous numbered drawings - requires expert drawing capabilities and extensive project management in order to produce
Problems associated traditional methods
The 'traditional' approach is to grab all the data and suck it into a database. This very often requires a person knowledgeable in setting up databases. This may also require setting up a server and initiating processes that cost money and are not open source.
Data may be comprised of small data sets from a variety of sources. Massaging the data so that it all mixes nicly may be more trouble than it's worth.
Features
Road Map
Issues
Not working on mobile devices
Possible fixes here:
Links of Interest / Graphing Knowledge
What's out there that we want to meet or exceed?
Mind Maps
Note: Examples mostly always show a single central node. Can we have fun with multiple node groups?
GraphQL
Mind maps expressed in a different way
Have you ever noticed that you very rarely see a graph when you read about GraphQL. Can we change that?
Xanadu / Ted Nelson
More
Test Applications
If our effort is to be useful then it should be able to display existing data sets in newly meaningful and informative ways.
The following are links to possible test case ideas
gbXML Product List
In the beginning we should probably be kicking this one around
Wardley Maps
Is there data for Wardley map in reproducible digital format
A Pattern Language
The book includes 253 patterns along with their links to each other, diagrams and more
Periodic Table
Might be a good place to start
Russell's version
Lego Projects
Ikea Product Assembly / Moving Manual Projects
Opentecture Projects
Data used in demos sourced from
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: