Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow custom-sized CIDR for the management subnets #422

Conversation

gthiemonge
Copy link
Contributor

@gthiemonge gthiemonge commented Dec 4, 2024

The octavia-operator previously required the user to pass /16 (or /64 for IPv6) CIDRs for the management subnets, now it's more flexible and allows custom sized CIDRs
The functional tests now check that the allocation pools are correctly set, based on those CIDRs.

JIRA: OSPRH-11711

The octavia-operator previously required the user to pass /16 (or /64
for IPv6) CIDRs for the management subnets, now it's more flexible and
allows custom sized CIDRs
The functional tests now check that the allocation pools are correctly
set, based on those CIDRs.

JIRA: OSPRH-11711
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from gibizer and karelyatin December 4, 2024 10:27
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gthiemonge

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Dec 4, 2024
@beagles
Copy link
Collaborator

beagles commented Dec 4, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Dec 4, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 3102aab into openstack-k8s-operators:main Dec 4, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants