Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update tls cert secret validation due VerifyCertSecrets() change #372

Conversation

stuggi
Copy link
Contributor

@stuggi stuggi commented Sep 6, 2024

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dprince and gibizer September 6, 2024 07:00
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Sep 6, 2024
condition.RequestedReason,
condition.SeverityInfo,
fmt.Sprintf(condition.TLSInputReadyWaitingMessage, instance.Spec.TLS.CaBundleSecretName)))
return ctrl.Result{}, nil
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here regarding RequeueAfter

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we index/watch the named cert secret, should not be required, or why you think we should have it?

condition.RequestedReason,
condition.SeverityInfo,
fmt.Sprintf(condition.TLSInputReadyWaitingMessage, instance.Spec.TLS.CaBundleSecretName)))
return ctrl.Result{}, nil
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another RequeueAfter needed?

condition.RequestedReason,
condition.SeverityInfo,
fmt.Sprintf(condition.TLSInputReadyWaitingMessage, err.Error())))
return ctrl.Result{}, nil
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another RequeueAfter needed?

Copy link
Contributor

@abays abays left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Sep 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 6, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abays, stuggi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@stuggi
Copy link
Contributor Author

stuggi commented Sep 6, 2024

/test octavia-operator-build-deploy-kuttl

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d049901 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Sep 6, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants