-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[rabbit] enable quorum queues #884
Open
SeanMooney
wants to merge
1
commit into
openstack-k8s-operators:main
Choose a base branch
from
SeanMooney:quorum_queues
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rabbit notes that durable queue are required for quorm queues
https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs/quorum-queues#feature-comparison
but the oslo messaging option is ignored if quorum queues are enabled
https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/blob/master/oslo_messaging/_drivers/amqp.py#L33-L37
so its more correct to not set this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh, good point, this wont' work w/o durable queues, and that requires separated vhosts for osp services, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The last time I tested a rabbit cluster with quorum queues with my Jepsen fork, it was not possible to do w/o setting durable queues, FYI.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so i think reading the commnet in oslo that oslo will enable durable queue if you request quorma cues and ignore the amqp_druable_queues value
this failed with
amqp.exceptions.PreconditionFailed: Exchange.declare: (406) PRECONDITION_FAILED - inequivalent arg 'durable' for exchange 'nova' in vhost '/': received 'true' but current is 'false'
and i think that was because all the other operators are using false.
ill try expclity setting ti to true but i think this just wont work without vhost
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, as other services would conflict on creating things (like exchange 'openstack') there with different persistence flags
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
technically, we might want to test the altogether switch of the openstack services to that option in the downstream testproject
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technically you should not be doing any dev downstream and we should be testing changing this everywhere upstream.
we could just make nova use a separate rabbit for this testing but in reality this is better to test manually in a local deployment then try and do it in the ci.
with that said i wont really have time to work on this so what ever way works for you.