Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DNM - POC: Add TopologySpreadConstraint to GlanceAPI statefulset #658

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fmount
Copy link
Contributor

@fmount fmount commented Nov 20, 2024

For each GlanceAPI, as part of the StatefulSet generated by GlanceAPITemplate, it is possible to specify a TopologySpreadConstraint, which is now included in the API.
If not specified, it can be inherited from the top-level Glance CR and applied to all the resulting sub-CRs.

@fmount fmount requested review from stuggi and olliewalsh November 20, 2024 08:51
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from konan-abhi November 20, 2024 08:51
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 20, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fmount

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

For each GlanceAPI, as part of the StatefulSet generated by
GlanceAPITemplate, it is possible to specify a TopologySpreadConstraint,
which is now included in the API. However, if not specified, it can be
inherited from the top-level Glance CR.

Signed-off-by: Francesco Pantano <[email protected]>
@fmount fmount changed the title Add TopologySpreadConstraint to GlanceAPI statefulset DNM - POC: Add TopologySpreadConstraint to GlanceAPI statefulset Nov 21, 2024
@fmount fmount closed this Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants