Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automate OLM cleanup for running local operator w/ webhooks #639

Merged

Conversation

abays
Copy link
Contributor

@abays abays commented Oct 16, 2024

When using make run-with-webhook, local versions of the operator and its webhooks are added to the cluster. If the operator was previously installed via OLM, then there might be lingering webhooks from that installation. We've previously been assuming that the user would manually remove them, but we should just get rid of them ourselves since those OLM webhooks need to be deleted anyhow for the local webhooks to function unimpeded. We can also automatically scale down the operator's OLM deployment in such a scenario.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from fmount and konan-abhi October 16, 2024 09:14
Copy link
Contributor

@fmount fmount left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm


if [ -n "${CSV_NAME}" ]; then
oc patch "${CSV_NAME}" -n openstack-operators --type=json -p="[{'op': 'replace', 'path': '/spec/install/spec/deployments/0/spec/replicas', 'value': 0}]"
oc patch "${CSV_NAME}" -n openstack-operators --type=json -p="[{'op': 'replace', 'path': '/spec/webhookdefinitions', 'value': []}]"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As a follow up, but just out of curiosity, do we want to update [1] to reflect this approach? (replace w/ an empty array instead of remove).

[1] https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/dev-docs/blob/main/webhooks.md#disabling-webhooks

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. In fact, I had consulted that doc while creating this and realized that this was a better way to do it. 😄

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abays, fmount

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@abays abays force-pushed the olm_webhook_cleanup branch from d135412 to 2902d3b Compare October 16, 2024 09:39
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Oct 16, 2024
@fmount
Copy link
Contributor

fmount commented Oct 16, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Oct 16, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 32b669e into openstack-k8s-operators:main Oct 16, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants