Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 25, 2024. It is now read-only.

Correct comment for OSDPS 'Play' object #890

Closed

Conversation

bshephar
Copy link
Contributor

@bshephar bshephar commented May 23, 2024

This change fixes the terminology used to describe the 'Play' object of the OpenStackDataPlaneService. This object is not an in-line 'playbook', but rather an individual Ansible 'Play'. The two are differentiated by their type. A Ansible Playbook is a list of Plays, where a Play is a dictionary object as per:

https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/10f9b8e6554e024e3561170153b8e7fde5e7e4fb/test/units/playbook/test_play.py#L48

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jpodivin and slagle May 23, 2024 01:28
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 23, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bshephar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

This change fixes the terminology used to describe the 'Play' object of the OpenStackDataPlaneService.
This object is not an in-line 'playbook', but rather an individual Ansible 'Play'. The two are differentiated
by their type. A Ansible Playbook is a list of Plays, where a Play is a dictionary object as per:

https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/10f9b8e6554e024e3561170153b8e7fde5e7e4fb/test/units/playbook/test_play.py\#L48

Signed-off-by: Brendan Shephard <[email protected]>
@bshephar bshephar closed this May 26, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant