Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 25, 2024. It is now read-only.

Update network-config-template to new format #426

Conversation

bshephar
Copy link
Contributor

@bshephar bshephar commented Sep 22, 2023

This commit updates the sample files to use the new format that will accept Jinja2 files instead of a file path. We maintain the edpm_network_config_override variable for now to be backwards compatible with other projects that depend on it existing.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/edpm-ansible#362
Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#581

This commit updates the sample files to use the new format that will
accept Jinja2 files instead of a file path. We maintain the
edpm_network_config_override variable for now to be backwards compatible
with other projects that depend on it existing.

Signed-off-by: Brendan Shephard <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from abays and olliewalsh September 22, 2023 02:02
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 22, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bshephar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/92cd5b4f25474997883d30d967a4b89b

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 35m 00s
podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc FAILURE in 1h 18m 01s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal SUCCESS in 56m 56s

@bshephar
Copy link
Contributor Author

recheck

@slawqo
Copy link
Contributor

slawqo commented Sep 22, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Sep 22, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 981db11 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Sep 22, 2023
2 checks passed
fao89 added a commit to fao89/data-plane-adoption that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
fao89 added a commit to fao89/data-plane-adoption that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
fao89 added a commit to fao89/data-plane-adoption that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
fao89 added a commit to fao89/data-plane-adoption that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
fao89 added a commit to fao89/data-plane-adoption that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
fao89 added a commit to fao89/data-plane-adoption that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
fao89 added a commit to fao89/data-plane-adoption that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
fao89 added a commit to fao89/data-plane-adoption that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
fao89 added a commit to fao89/data-plane-adoption that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants