-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rendering for Director Operator docs variant #753
Open
jistr
wants to merge
1
commit into
openstack-k8s-operators:main
Choose a base branch
from
jistr:f/ospdo-rendering
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need this so that the ifevals from Pini's patches that say
take effect. However, the OpenStackPreviousInstaller variable is not just used for the conditional, but also in the text. So it actually renders the "director_operator" value into the docs in several places like that, including the underscore.
We should probably replace all the
with
and then set the
OpenStackPreviousInstaller
variable to something that looks nice in the rendered docs? @klgill @pinikomarovThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah,
OpenStackPreviousInstaller
= director in the rendered downstream docs, and "TripleO" in the upstream rendered docs. This was done because downstream and upstream refer to the installer differently.TBH I'm not sure why
OpenStackPreviousInstaller
was being used for the ifeval statement for OSPdO docs. Does the OSPdO content need its own value for theOpenStackPreviousInstaller
variable in the text itself? Currently, we've just written the terms "director Operator" and "OSPdO" as is because the content is conditionalized for OSPdO anyway. I could be misunderstanding though.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I used OpenStackPreviousInstaller as a method to differentiate ospdo from regular director , that method could be any thing actually , as long as it preserves the logic