-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No sudoers groups exist with NOPASSWD #96
Comments
This is definitely going to be one of numerous origCL/newCL transition points. Now on Fedora/Atomic classically there are no predefined users for humans to log in other than I'd lean a bit towards doing the same in our built-in ignition schema - it feels aesthetically cleaner. Having a truly reserved user might be problematic in network-login scenarios etc. |
Strawman: something like:
plus changing our default sudo config to |
@bgilbert Any opinions on ⬆️ |
@cgwalters It seems I'm missing some context; I can't immediately locate the repo containing the file above. Why is In any event, if we're going to unconditionally create the |
It looks like this changed for rhcos, see commits in the dusty branch of bootengine. |
My argument is to do it conditionally; if no other users are specified, then we create the |
Derek added that to remove the coreos first boot line from grub. |
workaround for openshift#96
Updated assembler build here https://api.ci.openshift.org/console/project/coreos/browse/builds/coreos-assembler/coreos-assembler-18?tab=details |
OK, so there is no My strawman here is to add a This would increase compatibility with the first CLC from this CL users page. |
Following up on that example it also recommends the |
It doesn't.
Shouldn't that unit just ship with the OS instead? |
I think the work rahul is doing to "detect first boot a different way" will make the need for this go away so I anticipate removing it soon. |
@Rahuls0720 can you confirm ⬆️ |
This increases compatibility with the default CL configs. Closes: openshift#96
This increases compatibility with the default CL configs. Closes: openshift#96
By default it doesn't seem like any groups exist in
/etc/sudoers
. On Container Linux both the%sudo
group & thecore
user haveNOPASSWD
.The default
sudoers
for CL (from/usr/share/baselayout/sudoers
):The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: