Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reflect MetalKube rename to Metal3. #296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2019

Conversation

russellb
Copy link
Member

The MetalKube project had to be renamed. Reflect the new name here.
Leave the old API group in place for now while we complete the
transition. We will come back and remove it later.

The MetalKube project had to be renamed.  Reflect the new name here.
Leave the old API group in place for now while we complete the
transition.  We will come back and remove it later.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 23, 2019
@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Apr 24, 2019

level=error msg="Error: Error applying plan:"
level=error
level=error msg="1 error occurred:"
level=error msg="\t* module.vpc.aws_route_table_association.route_net[2]: 1 error occurred:"
level=error msg="\t* aws_route_table_association.route_net.2: timeout while waiting for state to become 'success' (timeout: 5m0s)"
level=error
level=error
level=error
level=error
level=error
level=error msg="Terraform does not automatically rollback in the face of errors."
level=error msg="Instead, your Terraform state file has been partially updated with"
level=error msg="any resources that successfully completed. Please address the error"
level=error msg="above and apply again to incrementally change your infrastructure."
level=error
level=error
level=fatal msg="failed to fetch Cluster: failed to generate asset \"Cluster\": failed to create cluster: failed to apply using Terraform"

/retest

@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Apr 24, 2019

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: enxebre

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 24, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@spangenberg spangenberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 24, 2019
@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Apr 24, 2019

 output: [init] using Kubernetes version: v1.12.0
[preflight] running pre-flight checks
	[WARNING Hostname]: hostname "minikube" could not be reached
	[WARNING Hostname]: hostname "minikube" lookup minikube on 172.18.0.2:53: no such host
[preflight] Some fatal errors occurred:
	[ERROR FileContent--proc-sys-net-bridge-bridge-nf-call-iptables]: /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables contents are not set to 1

/test integration

@vikaschoudhary16
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

11 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 25, 2019

@russellb: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/actuator-pkg-staleness 1dd802d link /test actuator-pkg-staleness

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants