We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This operator currently sets tectonicClusterID, but seems to ignore UserTags, which we use for things like expirationDate (openshift/release#1761). openshift/installer#465 is in flight with a generic helper that may make it easier to get the appropriate tags, but I'm not clear on how well that will plug in here. I'm also not sure how this plays with worker machine-sets possibly moving into the installer (CC @abhinavdahiya).
tectonicClusterID
UserTags
expirationDate
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Closing this as machines definition lives on the installer now For reference: openshift/installer#468 https://github.com/openshift/installer/tree/master/pkg/asset/machines
Sorry, something went wrong.
Merge pull request openshift#97 from spangenberg/availability-zone
947111b
Incorporate availability zone into placement decision
No branches or pull requests
This operator currently sets
tectonicClusterID
, but seems to ignoreUserTags
, which we use for things likeexpirationDate
(openshift/release#1761). openshift/installer#465 is in flight with a generic helper that may make it easier to get the appropriate tags, but I'm not clear on how well that will plug in here. I'm also not sure how this plays with worker machine-sets possibly moving into the installer (CC @abhinavdahiya).Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: