Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-44523: Remove unused variable from ASH arm template 06_workers.json #9204

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

jinyunma
Copy link
Contributor

@jinyunma jinyunma commented Nov 14, 2024

The content of arm template 06_workers.json in installer repo is shown in official azure stack hub upi installation doc, variables identityName is not being used, remove it to avoid confusion from user when creating UPI cluster on azure stack hub.

@jinyunma jinyunma changed the title Remove unused variable from ASH arm template 06_workers.json OCPBUGS-44523: Remove unused variable from ASH arm template 06_workers.json Nov 14, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-low Referenced Jira bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 14, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jinyunma: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44523, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jinyunma

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

The content of arm template 06_workers.json in installer repo is shown in official azure upi installation doc, variables identityName is not being used, remove it to avoid confusion from user when creating UPI cluster on azure stack hub.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 14, 2024

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: jinyunma.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@jinyunma: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44523, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jinyunma

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

The content of arm template 06_workers.json in installer repo is shown in official azure upi installation doc, variables identityName is not being used, remove it to avoid confusion from user when creating UPI cluster on azure stack hub.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jianlinliu
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jinyunma: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44523, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jinyunma

In response to this:

The content of arm template 06_workers.json in installer repo is shown in official azure stack hub upi installation doc, variables identityName is not being used, remove it to avoid confusion from user when creating UPI cluster on azure stack hub.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 14, 2024

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: jinyunma.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@jinyunma: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44523, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jinyunma

In response to this:

The content of arm template 06_workers.json in installer repo is shown in official azure stack hub upi installation doc, variables identityName is not being used, remove it to avoid confusion from user when creating UPI cluster on azure stack hub.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@gpei
Copy link
Contributor

gpei commented Nov 14, 2024

/test ci/prow/e2e-azurestack-upi

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 14, 2024

@gpei: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test altinfra-images
  • /test aro-unit
  • /test artifacts-images
  • /test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones-manifest-validation
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upi
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-upi
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-upi
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • /test e2e-openstack-ovn
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
  • /test gofmt
  • /test golint
  • /test govet
  • /test images
  • /test integration-tests
  • /test integration-tests-nodejoiner
  • /test okd-images
  • /test okd-unit
  • /test okd-verify-codegen
  • /test openstack-manifests
  • /test shellcheck
  • /test terraform-images
  • /test terraform-verify-vendor
  • /test tf-lint
  • /test unit
  • /test verify-codegen
  • /test verify-vendor
  • /test yaml-lint

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test altinfra-e2e-aws-custom-security-groups
  • /test altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn-fips
  • /test altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn-imdsv2
  • /test altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn-localzones
  • /test altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn-proxy
  • /test altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc
  • /test altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc-local-zones
  • /test altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc-wavelength-zones
  • /test altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
  • /test altinfra-e2e-aws-ovn-wavelengthzones
  • /test altinfra-e2e-azure-capi-ovn
  • /test altinfra-e2e-azure-ovn-shared-vpc
  • /test altinfra-e2e-gcp-capi-ovn
  • /test altinfra-e2e-gcp-ovn-byo-network-capi
  • /test altinfra-e2e-gcp-ovn-secureboot-capi
  • /test altinfra-e2e-gcp-ovn-xpn-capi
  • /test altinfra-e2e-ibmcloud-capi-ovn
  • /test altinfra-e2e-nutanix-capi-ovn
  • /test altinfra-e2e-openstack-capi-ccpmso
  • /test altinfra-e2e-openstack-capi-ccpmso-zone
  • /test altinfra-e2e-openstack-capi-dualstack
  • /test altinfra-e2e-openstack-capi-dualstack-upi
  • /test altinfra-e2e-openstack-capi-dualstack-v6primary
  • /test altinfra-e2e-openstack-capi-externallb
  • /test altinfra-e2e-openstack-capi-nfv-intel
  • /test altinfra-e2e-openstack-capi-ovn
  • /test altinfra-e2e-openstack-capi-proxy
  • /test altinfra-e2e-vsphere-capi-multi-vcenter-ovn
  • /test altinfra-e2e-vsphere-capi-ovn
  • /test altinfra-e2e-vsphere-capi-static-ovn
  • /test altinfra-e2e-vsphere-capi-zones
  • /test azure-ovn-marketplace-images
  • /test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-add-nodes
  • /test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-appliance-diskimage
  • /test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4-none-platform
  • /test e2e-agent-ha-dualstack
  • /test e2e-agent-sno-ipv4-pxe
  • /test e2e-agent-sno-ipv6
  • /test e2e-aws-overlay-mtu-ovn-1200
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-custom-iam-profile
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-heterogeneous
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-imdsv2
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-min-perms
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-proxy
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-public-ipv4-pool
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-public-ipv4-pool-disabled
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-public-subnets
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc-custom-security-groups
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc-edge-zones
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-workers-rhel8
  • /test e2e-aws-upi-proxy
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-resourcegroup
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-shared-vpc
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview
  • /test e2e-azurestack
  • /test e2e-azurestack-upi
  • /test e2e-crc
  • /test e2e-external-aws
  • /test e2e-external-aws-ccm
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-byo-vpc
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-heterogeneous
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-xpn
  • /test e2e-gcp-secureboot
  • /test e2e-gcp-upgrade
  • /test e2e-gcp-upi-xpn
  • /test e2e-ibmcloud-ovn
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-swapped-hosts
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-virtualmedia
  • /test e2e-metal-single-node-live-iso
  • /test e2e-nutanix-ovn
  • /test e2e-openstack-ccpmso
  • /test e2e-openstack-ccpmso-zone
  • /test e2e-openstack-dualstack
  • /test e2e-openstack-dualstack-upi
  • /test e2e-openstack-externallb
  • /test e2e-openstack-nfv-intel
  • /test e2e-openstack-proxy
  • /test e2e-openstack-singlestackv6
  • /test e2e-powervs-capi-ovn
  • /test e2e-vsphere-multi-vcenter-ovn
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi-zones
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-zones
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-zones-techpreview
  • /test e2e-vsphere-static-ovn
  • /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test okd-e2e-gcp
  • /test okd-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • /test okd-e2e-vsphere
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test okd-scos-images
  • /test tf-fmt

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-altinfra-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-aro-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-artifacts-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-azure-ovn-marketplace-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-azure-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-azure-ovn-shared-vpc
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-azure-ovn-upi
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-azurestack
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-azurestack-upi
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-gofmt
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-golint
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-govet
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-verify-codegen
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-shellcheck
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-tf-fmt
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-tf-lint
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-verify-codegen
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-verify-vendor
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-yaml-lint

In response to this:

/test ci/prow/e2e-azurestack-upi

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@gpei
Copy link
Contributor

gpei commented Nov 14, 2024

/test e2e-azurestack-upi

@jinyunma
Copy link
Contributor Author

Installation in Job e2e-azurestack-upi failed because of bug https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-43823, worker nodes were provisioned successfully.

@patrickdillon @r4f4 could you help to review? thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@r4f4 r4f4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 15, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: r4f4

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 15, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 5e705f0 and 2 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 5e705f0 and 2 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@jinyunma
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-azure-ovn-upi

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 5e705f0 and 2 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 8942ab8 and 1 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD a892cbd and 2 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 11aa461 and 1 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD aa70763 and 0 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD aa70763 and 2 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@barbacbd
Copy link
Contributor

barbacbd commented Dec 2, 2024

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 2, 2024
@barbacbd
Copy link
Contributor

barbacbd commented Dec 2, 2024

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 690783b and 2 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

3 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 690783b and 2 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 690783b and 2 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 690783b and 2 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 1e145d0 and 1 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ded83c4 and 2 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@jinyunma
Copy link
Contributor Author

jinyunma commented Dec 5, 2024

@r4f4 @barbacbd looks like job e2e-azure-ovn-upi always failed due to 2 failed e2e test cases. Rafael helped to override this job, but doesn't seem to take effect.
Does it need to be overridden again or any other way to make it pass? thanks.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4267038 and 1 for PR HEAD 405bd5e in total

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Dec 5, 2024

/override ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upi

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2024

@r4f4: Overrode contexts on behalf of r4f4: ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upi

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upi

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Dec 5, 2024

/override ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn
Not affected by this change.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2024

@r4f4: Overrode contexts on behalf of r4f4: ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn
Not affected by this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2024

@jinyunma: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit fef4be9 into openshift:master Dec 5, 2024
21 of 24 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jinyunma: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44523: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44523 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

The content of arm template 06_workers.json in installer repo is shown in official azure stack hub upi installation doc, variables identityName is not being used, remove it to avoid confusion from user when creating UPI cluster on azure stack hub.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-installer-terraform-providers
This PR has been included in build ose-installer-terraform-providers-container-v4.19.0-202412051538.p0.gfef4be9.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-installer-altinfra
This PR has been included in build ose-installer-altinfra-container-v4.19.0-202412051538.p0.gfef4be9.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-baremetal-installer
This PR has been included in build ose-baremetal-installer-container-v4.19.0-202412051538.p0.gfef4be9.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-installer-artifacts
This PR has been included in build ose-installer-artifacts-container-v4.19.0-202412051538.p0.gfef4be9.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@jinyunma jinyunma deleted the remove_unused_vars branch December 6, 2024 09:28
@jinyunma
Copy link
Contributor Author

jinyunma commented Dec 6, 2024

/cherry-pick release-4.17

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jinyunma: new pull request created: #9285

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@gpei
Copy link
Contributor

gpei commented Dec 6, 2024

@jinyunma we may need to cherry-pick it to 4.18 too as the master is targeted for 4.19 now.

@jinyunma
Copy link
Contributor Author

jinyunma commented Dec 6, 2024

/cherry-pick release-4.18

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jinyunma: new pull request created: #9286

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/severity-low Referenced Jira bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants