-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1837039: rhcos: Bump to 45.81.202005181029-0 #3613
Bug 1837039: rhcos: Bump to 45.81.202005181029-0 #3613
Conversation
Note: openvswitch looks removed at first glance but it's not. It bumped from Package diff:
|
Oh the addition of |
/test e2e-azure |
/test e2e-vsphere |
/retest |
/bugzilla refresh |
@cgwalters: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@cgwalters: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1765609, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@cgwalters: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1837039, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh |
@cgwalters: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1837039, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
A lot of red for these failing jobs across other commits and repos; failures don't seem related to this change AFAICS. But I would like to see e2e-azure pass, and ideally e2e-vsphere. The azure one seems like a likely machineAPI regression? |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, ashcrow The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test e2e-azure |
/hold cancel |
/retest |
/test e2e-azure |
/test e2e-azure |
OK Azure passed which makes me happier. I looked at the metal and vsphere failures briefly. AFAICS vsphere is known failures; being discussed elsewhere. Metal looks like networking flakes, although I don't see many of those in the periodics. Overall I think we should get this in because there are a whole lot of fixes, doesn't seem like a good idea to block on debugging those. |
Agreed. |
/test e2e-vsphere |
/lgtm |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
8 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@cgwalters: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
4 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@cgwalters: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/installer#3613. Bugzilla bug 1837039 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hi @cgwalters refer to this PR the kernel-devel will by default exist in this new version of RHCOS after 45.81.202005181029-0 ? Thanks |
Please see openshift/enhancements#317 for the future way this will work. |
A lot of fixes here, for example time synchronization, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828342
and entropy:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830280
In particular, we definitely need time sync on the bootstrap
node.