Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

openstack UPI: Automate Security Group creation #2593

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2019
Merged

openstack UPI: Automate Security Group creation #2593

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2019

Conversation

pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member

Create an Ansible playbook for deploying the Security Groups required
for a User Provided Infrastructure installation.

Implements https://jira.coreos.com/browse/OSASINFRA-785

Depends on #2580

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 30, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 31, 2019
@pierreprinetti pierreprinetti marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2019 10:16
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 31, 2019
@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @Fedosin @tomassedovic @mandre

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

/label platform/openstack

Create an Ansible playbook for deploying the Security Groups required
for a User Provided Infrastructure installation.

Implements https://jira.coreos.com/browse/OSASINFRA-785
@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

pierreprinetti commented Nov 4, 2019

/hold

While in Feature Freeze.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 4, 2019
@gageorsburn
Copy link

Curiosity question, why is this done with ansible and not terraform?

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

@gageorsburn

I believe it could have been either way; the RFE goes like this:

Ansible is a tool system administrators already tend to be familiar with

@gageorsburn
Copy link

Thanks for the information!

@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

/uncc @jstuever

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the request for review from jstuever November 11, 2019 18:50
@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 22, 2019
@iamemilio
Copy link

/retest

@tomassedovic
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 25, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pierreprinetti, tomassedovic

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

6 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

Don't give up, @openshift-bot!

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a9c3395 into openshift:master Nov 25, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pierreprinetti: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7 94a0ad5 link /test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@pierreprinetti pierreprinetti deleted the os_upi_ansible_secgroups branch November 27, 2019 09:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. platform/openstack size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants