-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1798596: take into consideration all instance states for deletion #291
Conversation
/cherry-pick release-4.3 |
@enxebre: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1798596, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@enxebre: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.3 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
This creates a conflict with #290 but better to resolve there I reckon
/hold
Unhold once that's acked
if err != nil { | ||
glog.Errorf("%s: error getting running instances: %v", machine.Name, err) | ||
glog.Errorf("%s: error getting existing instances: %v", machine.Name, err) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do we resolve the conflict this creates with #290? Within #290 once this is merged is probably easiest right? cc @alexander-demichev
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks! let's hold the other ones and let this move forwards as it's an important bug fix that we want to back port to 4.3 right away.
/unhold |
/approve /hold cancel |
/approve |
1 similar comment
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bison, enxebre, JoelSpeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest |
@enxebre: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1798596 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@enxebre: #291 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.3":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@enxebre: Bugzilla bug 1798596 is in an unrecognized state (ON_QA) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@enxebre: Bugzilla bug 1798596 is in an unrecognized state (ON_QA) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This fix deletion to take into consideration all instance states when deleting.
Otherwise instances with a provider state different than running will be leaked when deleting a machine.