Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update integTest gradle scripts to run via remote cluster independently #281

Closed
Tracked by #103
saratvemulapalli opened this issue Nov 11, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #327
Closed
Tracked by #103

Update integTest gradle scripts to run via remote cluster independently #281

saratvemulapalli opened this issue Nov 11, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #327
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request v1.3.0

Comments

@saratvemulapalli
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem?
With the existing implementation of integration tests, opensearch plugins use the same test framework as local integration tests which spin up test clusters by itself. This is a hacky way to override the endpoint from local spun up test clusters (via opensearch.testclusters gradle plugin) with the remote cluster endpoint.

The solution doesn't work when we would like to test the opensearch bundle as part of the release. The test frameworks expect the artifact to be available before we could test them. To clean this up, plugins have to create gradle scripts for remote endpoints to run https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-build#integration-tests for the release cycle.

What solution would you like?
Refer to: opensearch-project/anomaly-detection#298 and make similar changes to the plugin.
Also if you have a custom name to invoke these tests, update the integtest.sh script in https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-build/blob/main/scripts/default/integtest.sh

@saratvemulapalli saratvemulapalli added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 11, 2021
@joshuali925 joshuali925 self-assigned this Nov 30, 2021
@joshuali925 joshuali925 linked a pull request Dec 10, 2021 that will close this issue
6 tasks
MaxKsyunz pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 11, 2023
* Added new datetime functions and aliases to PPL (#281)

* Added new functions, and alias' to PPL

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

* removed message about functions not working with dates with 0 month/day as those dates don't exist

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

* changed documentation to be in alphabetical order

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 11, 2023
* Added new datetime functions and aliases to PPL (#281)

* Added new functions, and alias' to PPL

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

* removed message about functions not working with dates with 0 month/day as those dates don't exist

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

* changed documentation to be in alphabetical order

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e44d983)
penghuo pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 11, 2023
* Added new datetime functions and aliases to PPL (#281)

* Added new functions, and alias' to PPL

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

* removed message about functions not working with dates with 0 month/day as those dates don't exist

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

* changed documentation to be in alphabetical order

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e44d983)

Co-authored-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 11, 2023
* Added new datetime functions and aliases to PPL (#281)

* Added new functions, and alias' to PPL

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

* removed message about functions not working with dates with 0 month/day as those dates don't exist

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

* changed documentation to be in alphabetical order

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e44d983)
Yury-Fridlyand pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 11, 2023
* Added new datetime functions and aliases to PPL (#281)

* Added new functions, and alias' to PPL

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

* removed message about functions not working with dates with 0 month/day as those dates don't exist

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

* changed documentation to be in alphabetical order

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e44d983)

Co-authored-by: Matthew Wells <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request v1.3.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants