Fix import for TransportAddress after core refactor #9073

[willyborankin]

Description

This PR fixed TransportAddress imports after core refactor in #9073

Testing

[Please provide details of testing done: unit testing, integration testing and manual testing]

Check List

• New functionality includes testing
• New functionality has been documented
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3091 (5b4bfea) into main (5384272) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #3091      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     62.42%   62.39%   -0.04%     
+ Complexity     3352     3350       -2     
============================================
  Files           254      254              
  Lines         19741    19741              
  Branches       3334     3334              
============================================
- Hits          12324    12318       -6     
- Misses         5787     5790       +3     
- Partials       1630     1633       +3     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
.../opensearch/security/OpenSearchSecurityPlugin.java	84.34% <ø> (ø)
...earch/security/auditlog/impl/AbstractAuditLog.java	76.48% <ø> (ø)
...pensearch/security/auditlog/impl/AuditMessage.java	74.00% <ø> (ø)
...search/security/auditlog/impl/RequestResolver.java	67.75% <ø> (ø)
.../org/opensearch/security/auth/BackendRegistry.java	60.13% <ø> (ø)
...ava/org/opensearch/security/auth/UserInjector.java	90.00% <ø> (ø)
...ty/configuration/SecurityIndexSearcherWrapper.java	88.88% <ø> (ø)
...earch/security/dlic/rest/api/AccountApiAction.java	85.13% <ø> (ø)
.../security/dlic/rest/api/PermissionsInfoAction.java	19.56% <ø> (ø)
...dlic/rest/api/RestApiAdminPrivilegesEvaluator.java	71.42% <ø> (ø)
... and 11 more

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[peternied]

:( I am concerned that there is no valid snapshot with the transport changes, 🤞 soon we get another update?

[willyborankin]

:( I am concerned that there is no valid snapshot with the transport changes, 🤞 soon we get another update?

no looks like only BWC tests which is expected.

[cwperks]

The failures last night were due to stale minimum distribution, but now it looks like this may need to be backported to 2.x before merged into main to fix the bwc checks.

[cwperks]

Thank you @willyborankin !