Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update build.gradle to use alerting-spi snapshot version #1217

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2024

Conversation

sbcd90
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbcd90 sbcd90 commented Aug 5, 2024

Description

update build.gradle to use alerting-spi snapshot version

Issues Resolved

#1193

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@@ -168,7 +171,7 @@ dependencies {
compileOnly "org.opensearch.client:opensearch-rest-client:${opensearch_version}"
compileOnly "org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib:${kotlin_version}"
compileOnly "org.opensearch:opensearch-job-scheduler-spi:${opensearch_build}"
compileOnly "org.opensearch.alerting:alerting-spi:${opensearch_build}"
compileOnly "org.opensearch.alerting:alerting-spi:${alerting_spi_build}"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is it not similar to the job scheduler spi??

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

plz match the naming convention version of the alerting spi to job scheduler spi

@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ buildscript {
if (buildVersionQualifier) {
opensearch_build += "-${buildVersionQualifier}"
}

alerting_spi_build = opensearch_build
alerting_spi_build += "-SNAPSHOT"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't we supposed to pick from the non-released versions, like we do with the main alerting repo today?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator

@AWSHurneyt AWSHurneyt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comments will be addressed in separate PR.

@AWSHurneyt AWSHurneyt merged commit ddfa87c into opensearch-project:main Aug 5, 2024
15 of 18 checks passed
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2024
Signed-off-by: Subhobrata Dey <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit ddfa87c)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2024
Signed-off-by: Subhobrata Dey <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit ddfa87c)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
AWSHurneyt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2024
(cherry picked from commit ddfa87c)

Signed-off-by: Subhobrata Dey <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
AWSHurneyt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2024
(cherry picked from commit ddfa87c)

Signed-off-by: Subhobrata Dey <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants