Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add blog post "OpenSearch in Hopsworks" + Authors #2916

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MagicLex
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Add blog post "OpenSearch in Hopsworks" + Authors

Issues Resolved

[List any issues this PR will resolve]

Check List

  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the BSD-3-Clause License.

Copy link

@smacrakis smacrakis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line 50 should be removed ("div>").
The section "Enabling RAG for LLMs with OpenSearch" should mention how OpenSearch is a feature-complete search solution, offering not just vector search but also other, complementary technologies.
As a general rule, semantic search should be used as part of a hybrid search to get the best results -- after all, if the R phase of RAG doesn't return a result, the G phase can't use it.

@MagicLex
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for your feedback.

  • Removed the stray "div>" tag.
  • Added information about OpenSearch's potential for hybrid search in RAG applications.
  • Kept the description general to avoid overstating our current implementation in Hopsworks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Editorial Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants