-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Transport service #170
Transport service #170
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #170 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 66.00% 66.44% +0.43%
Complexity 96 96
============================================
Files 25 25
Lines 456 456
Branches 13 12 -1
============================================
+ Hits 301 303 +2
+ Misses 147 146 -1
+ Partials 8 7 -1
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code changes look good. Just need some doc fixes on the constructor javadoc.
f2399fb
to
6eab1a5
Compare
Signed-off-by: mloufra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: mloufra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: mloufra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: mloufra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: mloufra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: mloufra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Widdis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Widdis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Widdis <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed the bind errors by moving the netty initialization out of the constructor in the Extensions Runner and backed out the "hack" solution from intervening PR. The rest is what was ready to go before this weekend and is GTG now! :)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Widdis <[email protected]>
@ryanbogan can you help resolve the conflicts of this PR with #146 which was recently merged? Build is failing on the additional arguments to |
That method should take a threadPool parameter too. Adding that will let the compile check pass |
I can't access the branch with the changes for some reason. The only branch I see on @mloufra 's fork is main. |
I fork our sdk repo again this morning. That's why only main branch in my fork repo. |
@mloufra you should close this PR and raise again with the new fork repo as you won't be able to access |
Thanks. |
Description
To avoid passing the object of
extensionRunner
inExtensionsRunner
main function, move all of the required methods and variables toNettyTransport
fileAddress comment from previous PR.
Issues Resolved
#166
#116
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.