add datastream support #735
Conversation
cgroschupp
force-pushed
the
index-template-datastream
branch
3 times, most recently
from
33cddae
to
d55bdf4
Compare
cgroschupp
requested review from
idanl21,
dbason,
swoehrl-mw,
prudhvigodithi,
jochenkressin,
pchmielnik and
salyh
as code owners
cgroschupp
force-pushed
the
index-template-datastream
branch
from
d55bdf4
to
d1addb6
Compare
|
Great! I would love this feature in the next coming release! (perhaps 2.5.2? #749) |
|
@cthtrifork As this is a new feature, I think the 2.6.0 version is better. @idanl21 Can you please review this pull request? |
|
Thanks @cgroschupp for your contribution, before we get this PR merged, can you please open an issue summarizing the datastream support in detail? This way your contribution is tracked in the issue and later we can link this PR to the issue. Adding @bbarani @salyh @jochenkressin @pchmielnik @swoehrl-mw |
|
@prudhvigodithi done |
|
@cgroschupp Before we can get this PR merged, please refer to the PR guideline and add the mssing prerequisites. Thank you very much. |
|
Hey @cgroschupp we can push this to |
Signed-off-by: Christian Groschupp <[email protected]>
cgroschupp
force-pushed
the
index-template-datastream
branch
from
21902d3
to
fad542a
Compare
Signed-off-by: Christian Groschupp <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Groschupp <[email protected]>
cgroschupp
force-pushed
the
index-template-datastream
branch
from
fad542a
to
2973c9f
Compare
|
@prudhvigodithi done |
|
|
||
| type OpensearchDatastreamSpec struct { | ||
| // TimestampField for dataStream | ||
| TimestampField OpensearchDatastreamTimestampFieldSpec `json:"timestamp_field,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Every other field is camelCase, so this should as well to be consistent
cgroschupp
force-pushed
the
index-template-datastream
branch
from
eba54ab
to
2d1982c
Compare
cgroschupp
force-pushed
the
index-template-datastream
branch
from
2d1982c
to
a058ed7
Compare
Description
Add DataStream support to IndexTemplate.
Close #766