enhance connector helper notebook to support 2.9

[ylwu-amzn]

Description

enhance connector helper notebook to support 2.9

Issues Resolved

[List any issues this PR will resolve]

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
  • All tests pass
• New functionality has been documented.
  • New functionality has javadoc added
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[Zhangxunmt]

This works. But given that it applies to newer versions after 2.9, my concern is that it makes people think this "model_group" is totally a "chicken rib" because it shares the name with model name. And model name is mostly unique so it ends up with unique model name with a dedicated model group.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.92%. Comparing base (9a913d6) to head (e181453).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #2202   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     81.91%   81.92%           
- Complexity     5720     5722    +2     
=========================================
  Files           547      547           
  Lines         23064    23064           
  Branches       2378     2378           
=========================================
+ Hits          18893    18895    +2     
+ Misses         3227     3224    -3     
- Partials        944      945    +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
ml-commons	81.92% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ylwu-amzn]

And model name is mostly unique so it ends up with unique model name with a dedicated model group.

Model group name is unique, but model name not. One model group can have multiple models with same model name.

[minalsha]

@ylwu-amzn why do we need to have this when we have Flow framework which exactly does this right now?

[ylwu-amzn]

@ylwu-amzn why do we need to have this when we have Flow framework which exactly does this right now?

But we don't have flow framework on AWS now, right ? This is to help current AWS cx