-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for context_size and include 'interaction_id' in SearchRe… #1385
Conversation
…sponse. [Issue opensearch-project#1372] Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]>
Seems like a flaky test. |
@dhrubo-os @jngz-es @ylwu-amzn can you please take a look at this PR? Thanks. |
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ | |||
import lombok.Getter; | |||
import lombok.NoArgsConstructor; | |||
import lombok.Setter; | |||
import org.opensearch.common.recycler.Recycler; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Didn't see where to use it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed. I added "spotless" so I don't miss stuff like this going forward.
/* | ||
* error={message=This model's maximum context length is 4097 tokens. However, your messages resulted in 4456 tokens. | ||
* Please reduce the length of the messages., | ||
* type=invalid_request_error, param=messages, code=context_length_exceeded} | ||
*/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed.
if (Strings.isNullOrEmpty(systemPrompt) && Strings.isNullOrEmpty(userInstructions)) { | ||
systemPrompt = DEFAULT_SYSTEM_PROMPT; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If only userInstructions exists, we don't set default system promt for chat use case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's right. Actually, you can pass a system prompt as part of user instructions. We are getting some mixed results and keep the behavior this way so we can do more experiments.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #1385 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 78.35% 78.49% +0.14%
- Complexity 2275 2296 +21
============================================
Files 190 190
Lines 9286 9418 +132
Branches 910 934 +24
============================================
+ Hits 7276 7393 +117
- Misses 1599 1602 +3
- Partials 411 423 +12
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
@@ -58,11 +60,16 @@ public class GenerativeQAResponseProcessor extends AbstractProcessor implements | |||
|
|||
private static final int DEFAULT_CHAT_HISTORY_WINDOW = 10; | |||
|
|||
private static final int MAX_PROCESSOR_TIME_IN_SECONDS = 60; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like DEFAULT
makes more sense here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm.. Maybe a "max" value doesn't make sense here, although I think 60 seconds is a long time. I will change this to a 30 second default time (timeout).
private static final ParseField INTERACTION_SIZE = new ParseField("interaction_size"); | ||
private static final ParseField TIMEOUT = new ParseField("timeout"); | ||
|
||
public static final int SIZE_NULL_VALUE = -1; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we please add a comment for this variable as the variable name isn't quite self explanatory.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
} | ||
log.info("Using interaction size of {}", interactionSize); | ||
List<Interaction> chatHistory = (conversationId == null) ? Collections.emptyList() : memoryClient.getInteractions(conversationId, interactionSize); | ||
log.info("Retrieved chat history. ({})", getDuration(start)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just curious to know what's the goal of adding getDuration(start)
in the log?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It logs the elapsed time for client
calls. I can use debug
for the log level.
@@ -37,6 +42,7 @@ | |||
|
|||
import java.util.ArrayList; | |||
import java.util.List; | |||
import java.util.function.BiFunction; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did we use these newly imported libraries?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed.
@@ -93,45 +102,94 @@ public SearchResponse processResponse(SearchRequest request, SearchResponse resp | |||
} | |||
|
|||
GenerativeQAParameters params = GenerativeQAParamUtil.getGenerativeQAParameters(request); | |||
|
|||
Integer timeout = params.getTimeout(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one liner?
Integer timeout = (params.getTimeout() != null && params.getTimeout() != GenerativeQAParameters.SIZE_NULL_VALUE) ? params.getTimeout() : MAX_PROCESSOR_TIME_IN_SECONDS;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, that would involve calling .getTimeout()
up to three times. Does the Java compiler do something clever to avoid that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good point. We could do:
Integer timeoutValue = params.getTimeout();
Integer timeout = (timeoutValue != null && timeoutValue != GenerativeQAParameters.SIZE_NULL_VALUE) ? timeoutValue : MAX_PROCESSOR_TIME_IN_SECONDS;
But upto you, keep the code as it is if you want.
List<Interaction> chatHistory = (conversationId == null) ? Collections.emptyList() : memoryClient.getInteractions(conversationId, interactionSize); | ||
log.info("Retrieved chat history. ({})", getDuration(start)); | ||
|
||
Integer topN = params.getContextSize(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one liner?
Integer topN = params.getContextSize() != null ? params.getContextSize() : GenerativeQAParameters.SIZE_NULL_VALUE;
builder.field(GENERATIVE_QA_ERROR_FIELD_NAME, this.errorMessage); | ||
} else { | ||
/* body of our stuff */ | ||
builder.field(GENERATIVE_QA_ANSWER_FIELD_NAME, this.answer); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apology if I missed it, don't we need corresponding parser?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a TODO
at the top of the file to address your question.
for (String result : contexts) { | ||
messageArray.add(new Message(ChatRole.USER, "SEARCH RESULT: " + result).toJson()); | ||
|
||
/* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we keeping this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No.
Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]>
@dhrubo-os @jngz-es anything else? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
// TODO Add "interaction_count". This is how far back in chat history we want to go back when calling LLM. | ||
private static final int DEFAULT_PROCESSOR_TIME_IN_SECONDS = 30; | ||
|
||
// TODO Add "interaction_count". This is how far back in chat history we want to go back when calling LLM. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would this be a hard add?
opensearch-project#1385) * Add support for context_size and include 'interaction_id' in SearchResponse. [Issue opensearch-project#1372] Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> * Added spotless, removed unused code, added more comments. Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: HenryL27 <[email protected]>
opensearch-project#1385) * Add support for context_size and include 'interaction_id' in SearchResponse. [Issue opensearch-project#1372] Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> * Added spotless, removed unused code, added more comments. Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ae6995a) Signed-off-by: HenryL27 <[email protected]>
opensearch-project#1385) * Add support for context_size and include 'interaction_id' in SearchResponse. [Issue opensearch-project#1372] Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> * Added spotless, removed unused code, added more comments. Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ae6995a) Signed-off-by: HenryL27 <[email protected]>
#1385) (#1433) * Add support for context_size and include 'interaction_id' in SearchResponse. [Issue #1372] * Added spotless, removed unused code, added more comments. --------- (cherry picked from commit ae6995a) Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: HenryL27 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]>
opensearch-project#1385) (opensearch-project#1433) * Add support for context_size and include 'interaction_id' in SearchResponse. [Issue opensearch-project#1372] * Added spotless, removed unused code, added more comments. --------- (cherry picked from commit ae6995a) Signed-off-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: HenryL27 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Austin Lee <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: TrungBui59 <[email protected]>
Description
[Describe what this change achieves]
Issues Resolved
#1372
Check List
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.