Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add applicable_data_sources field to workflows definition #1888

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

Swiddis
Copy link
Collaborator

@Swiddis Swiddis commented Jun 10, 2024

Description

Manual backport of #1868 to 2.x

Issues Resolved

N/A

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass, including unit test, integration test and doctest
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
    • New functionality has user manual doc added
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@Swiddis Swiddis added enhancement New feature or request integrations Used to denote items related to the Integrations project ux-integration ux related integration issues labels Jun 10, 2024
@Swiddis Swiddis changed the base branch from main to 2.x June 10, 2024 21:33
Signed-off-by: Simeon Widdis <[email protected]>
@Swiddis Swiddis changed the title Backport #1868 to 2.x Add applicable_data_sources field to workflows definition Jun 10, 2024
@Swiddis Swiddis merged commit 9b14258 into opensearch-project:2.x Jun 10, 2024
14 of 19 checks passed
@Swiddis Swiddis deleted the backport-1868-to-2.x branch June 10, 2024 21:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request integrations Used to denote items related to the Integrations project ux-integration ux related integration issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants