Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[backport to 2.x] Fix preview not considering rules and imputation options (#898) #899

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

kaituo
Copy link
Collaborator

@kaituo kaituo commented Oct 17, 2024

Description

backport #898 to 2.x

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

…rch-project#898)

This commit resolves a bug where the preview API did not account for suppression rules and imputation options. The fix involves passing additional parameters to handle these configurations correctly.

Testing:
* e2e testing completed.
* UT added to cover the new logic.

Signed-off-by: Kaituo Li <[email protected]>
@amitgalitz
Copy link
Member

nit: can you add to title [Backport 2.x]

@kaituo kaituo changed the title Fix preview API not considering rules and imputation options (#898) [backport to 2.x] Fix preview API not considering rules and imputation options (#898) Oct 18, 2024
@kaituo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kaituo commented Oct 18, 2024

nit: can you add to title [Backport 2.x]

added.

@kaituo kaituo changed the title [backport to 2.x] Fix preview API not considering rules and imputation options (#898) [backport to 2.x] Fix preview not considering rules and imputation options (#898) Oct 18, 2024
@amitgalitz amitgalitz merged commit 6e51fc8 into opensearch-project:2.x Oct 18, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants