Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wait for detector to load before checking indices exist #262

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2022

Conversation

amitgalitz
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Amit Galitzky [email protected]

Description

Added two new conditions to two different useEffect calls on DetectorDetail page.
First change is to wait for getDetector request to finish loading before checking if the indices themselves exist. Currently we are checking if the indices exist on every change to the detector and while the detector is still loading it continuously loops this API call to check for indices. This then triggers a change in AppState which triggers the change in detector variable hence the loop.

The second change is under the same idea where we don't need to call the useEffect that calls on hideStopDetectorModal if the detector itself is empty.

Further improvements will be made in later PR to optimize useFetchDetectorInfo further which is the call updating the detector variable.

Issues Resolved

resolves #251

Check List

  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@amitgalitz amitgalitz requested a review from a team May 17, 2022 19:16
Copy link
Member

@ohltyler ohltyler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - thanks for these improvements!

@ohltyler
Copy link
Member

@amitgalitz we want to backport to 2.0 as well right?

@amitgalitz
Copy link
Member Author

@amitgalitz we want to backport to 2.0 as well right?

yes and 1.x, 1.3, forgot to add labels, just added them

@amitgalitz amitgalitz merged commit 3b1b845 into opensearch-project:main May 17, 2022
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
Signed-off-by: Amit Galitzky <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3b1b845)
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
Signed-off-by: Amit Galitzky <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3b1b845)
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
Signed-off-by: Amit Galitzky <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3b1b845)
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
Signed-off-by: Amit Galitzky <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3b1b845)
amitgalitz added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
Signed-off-by: Amit Galitzky <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3b1b845)
amitgalitz added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
Signed-off-by: Amit Galitzky <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3b1b845)
amitgalitz added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
Signed-off-by: Amit Galitzky <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3b1b845)
amitgalitz added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
Signed-off-by: Amit Galitzky <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3b1b845)
@amitgalitz amitgalitz added the bug Something isn't working label May 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] a lot of getting all indices error when open sample detector page
3 participants