Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Star tree] Star tree file formats refactoring and fixing offset bug #15975

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

bharath-techie
Copy link
Contributor

@bharath-techie bharath-techie commented Sep 18, 2024

Description

This PR removes the exposure of DocIdSetIterator in the file formats flow.

So, in order to prevent exposing DISI directly as part of star tree file format readers , this change contains a simple wrapper iterator that abstracts the DISI , and exposes relevant methods tied to star tree to retrieve the values.

Apart from this also fixing a bug where file size greater than Integer.MaxValue is not handled correctly.

Related Issues

#15974 - issue for the bug found with offsets

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for f6d3ca9: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@bharath-techie bharath-techie force-pushed the starrefactor branch 2 times, most recently from 67e8e7e to 14a7575 Compare September 18, 2024 10:35
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 67e8e7e: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 14a7575: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for b4f38ea: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❕ Gradle check result for b4f38ea: UNSTABLE

  • TEST FAILURES:
      1 org.opensearch.remotestore.RemoteStoreStatsIT.testDownloadStatsCorrectnessSinglePrimaryMultipleReplicaShards

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 77.04918% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.92%. Comparing base (3937ccb) to head (b4f38ea).
Report is 110 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...be/startree/utils/SequentialDocValuesIterator.java 68.75% 2 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...cube/startree/builder/StarTreeDocsFileManager.java 50.00% 1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...eindex/datacube/startree/index/StarTreeValues.java 76.92% 1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...tartree/utils/iterator/StarTreeValuesIterator.java 57.14% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #15975      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.90%   71.92%   +0.02%     
+ Complexity    64392    64351      -41     
============================================
  Files          5278     5280       +2     
  Lines        300877   300870       -7     
  Branches      43478    43476       -2     
============================================
+ Hits         216351   216412      +61     
+ Misses        66747    66655      -92     
- Partials      17779    17803      +24     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sachinpkale sachinpkale merged commit 80ff07e into opensearch-project:main Sep 19, 2024
61 of 64 checks passed
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Signed-off-by: Bharathwaj G <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 80ff07e)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
amberzsy pushed a commit to amberzsy/OpenSearch-public that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2024
@bharath-techie bharath-techie added backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch and removed backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch labels Sep 27, 2024
@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Navigate to the root of your repository
cd $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x 2.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
pushd ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-15975-to-2.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 80ff07eb0c5485832e6fcbc46a9d100435ed3051
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-15975-to-2.x
# Go back to the original working tree
popd
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.x and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-15975-to-2.x.

@bharath-techie bharath-techie added backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch and removed backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch backport-failed labels Oct 14, 2024
@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Navigate to the root of your repository
cd $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x 2.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
pushd ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-15975-to-2.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 80ff07eb0c5485832e6fcbc46a9d100435ed3051
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-15975-to-2.x
# Go back to the original working tree
popd
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.x and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-15975-to-2.x.

bharath-techie added a commit to bharath-techie/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
dbwiddis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
…5991)

(cherry picked from commit 80ff07e)

Signed-off-by: Bharathwaj G <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
dk2k pushed a commit to dk2k/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
dk2k pushed a commit to dk2k/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
dk2k pushed a commit to dk2k/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants