Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo in RemoveProcessor #11983

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

gaobinlong
Copy link
Collaborator

@gaobinlong gaobinlong commented Jan 23, 2024

Description

Fix the typo in RemoveProcessor, ether should be either, and either ... and should be either ... or.

Related Issues

No issue, the typo was introduced by this PR, when I wrote document for the functionality in that PR, I found this typo.

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Failing checks are inspected and point to the corresponding known issue(s) (See: Troubleshooting Failing Builds)
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
  • Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)
  • Public documentation issue/PR created

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2024

Compatibility status:

Checks if related components are compatible with change 558311d

Incompatible components

Incompatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/asynchronous-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/custom-codecs.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/sql.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/cross-cluster-replication.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer-rca.git]

Skipped components

Compatible components

Compatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/security-analytics.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/observability.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/reporting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/notifications.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-oci-object-storage.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/job-scheduler.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/neural-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/common-utils.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/geospatial.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/anomaly-detection.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/index-management.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/ml-commons.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/alerting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-nn.git]

Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for b1ad6f3: SUCCESS

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 558311d: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❕ Gradle check result for 558311d: UNSTABLE

  • TEST FAILURES:
      1 org.opensearch.search.SearchWeightedRoutingIT.testMultiGetWithNetworkDisruption_FailOpenEnabled

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (304042f) 71.37% compared to head (558311d) 71.40%.
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #11983      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.37%   71.40%   +0.02%     
+ Complexity    59403    59379      -24     
============================================
  Files          4923     4923              
  Lines        279214   279214              
  Branches      40596    40596              
============================================
+ Hits         199302   199375      +73     
+ Misses        63375    63249     -126     
- Partials      16537    16590      +53     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dblock dblock added the backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch label Jan 23, 2024
@dblock dblock merged commit b61bd14 into opensearch-project:main Jan 23, 2024
34 checks passed
@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Navigate to the root of your repository
cd $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x 2.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
pushd ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-11983-to-2.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 b61bd1415de4e7b961566a5ec8de6bc207ba34d0
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-11983-to-2.x
# Go back to the original working tree
popd
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.x and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-11983-to-2.x.

@reta
Copy link
Collaborator

reta commented Jan 23, 2024

@gaobinlong could you please backport to 2.x manually? thank you

gaobinlong added a commit to gaobinlong/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2024
* Fix typo in RemoveProcessor

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>

* Modify changelog

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit b61bd14)
andrross pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2024
* Fix typo in RemoveProcessor

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>

* Modify changelog

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit b61bd14)
peteralfonsi pushed a commit to peteralfonsi/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
* Fix typo in RemoveProcessor

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>

* Modify changelog

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>
rayshrey pushed a commit to rayshrey/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2024
* Fix typo in RemoveProcessor

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>

* Modify changelog

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>
shiv0408 pushed a commit to Gaurav614/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
* Fix typo in RemoveProcessor

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>

* Modify changelog

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Gao Binlong <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shivansh Arora <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants