Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test data for query enhancement functional tests #9006

Closed

Conversation

ananzh
Copy link
Member

@ananzh ananzh commented Dec 4, 2024

Description

Add test data for query enhancement

Issues Resolved

na

Screenshot

na

Changelog

  • skip

Check List

  • All tests pass
    • yarn test:jest
    • yarn test:jest_integration
  • New functionality includes testing.
  • New functionality has been documented.
  • Update CHANGELOG.md
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

Signed-off-by: Anan Zhuang <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 60.87%. Comparing base (c6f5c8f) to head (2eecb7d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on cypress-unification.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                   Coverage Diff                   @@
##           cypress-unification    #9006      +/-   ##
=======================================================
- Coverage                60.88%   60.87%   -0.01%     
=======================================================
  Files                     3802     3802              
  Lines                    91083    91070      -13     
  Branches                 14383    14374       -9     
=======================================================
- Hits                     55455    55443      -12     
  Misses                   32086    32086              
+ Partials                  3542     3541       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
Linux_1 29.02% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Linux_2 56.39% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Linux_3 37.89% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Linux_4 29.00% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Windows_1 29.03% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Windows_2 56.34% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Windows_3 37.90% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Windows_4 29.00% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

ananzh added a commit to ananzh/OpenSearch-Dashboards that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
ananzh added a commit to ananzh/OpenSearch-Dashboards that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
ananzh added a commit to ananzh/OpenSearch-Dashboards that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
LDrago27 pushed a commit to ananzh/OpenSearch-Dashboards that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
AMoo-Miki pushed a commit to AMoo-Miki/OpenSearch-Dashboards that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
ananzh added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
* Follow up on #9048 by updating data and utilities

Feature branch PRs:
#9038
#9006

Signed-off-by: Anan <[email protected]>

* fix comment

Signed-off-by: Anan <[email protected]>

* update path and add utility from suchit commit

Signed-off-by: Anan <[email protected]>

* update the path to run sample test

Signed-off-by: Anan <[email protected]>

* fix PR comments

Signed-off-by: Anan <[email protected]>

* skip tests before enable workspace

Signed-off-by: Anan <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Anan <[email protected]>
AMoo-Miki pushed a commit to AMoo-Miki/OpenSearch-Dashboards that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2024
@ananzh ananzh added the discover_2.0-test Issues that are specific to the Discover 2.0 testing initiative label Jan 10, 2025
@ananzh
Copy link
Member Author

ananzh commented Jan 10, 2025

Close it as we combine this and other PRs and move to main

@ananzh ananzh closed this Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discover_2.0-test Issues that are specific to the Discover 2.0 testing initiative distinguished-contributor Skip-Changelog PRs that are too trivial to warrant a changelog or release notes entry
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants