-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 916
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Worksapce]Add blank check for workspace name #7512
Merged
SuZhou-Joe
merged 7 commits into
opensearch-project:main
from
Hailong-am:workspace_name_validation
Aug 8, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ffbcb00
add workspace blank check
Hailong-am 060aaee
Changeset file for PR #7512 created/updated
opensearch-changeset-bot[bot] 4c4b09a
Merge branch 'main' into workspace_name_validation
Hailong-am ba8fb13
Merge branch 'main' into workspace_name_validation
Hailong-am 9a852f7
add integ test
Hailong-am 6f4c08a
Merge branch 'main' into workspace_name_validation
Hailong-am 6188f35
Changeset file for PR #7512 created/updated
opensearch-changeset-bot[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
fix: | ||
- [Workspace]add workspace name blank/empty check ([#7512](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch-Dashboards/pull/7512)) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if the error message is clear enough for customers to understand what happens here, and from the description of the input, it seems space are valid input though the name can not be pure spaces.
And should we wrap it with i18n?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
field name will prepend to actual message, the whole error message will be
as the default validation message of schema.string()haven't been wrapped by i18n. i think we can keep it same